1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

What role could envy play in the salvation process?

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by Skandelon, Mar 7, 2011.

  1. Andy T.

    Andy T. Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2005
    Messages:
    3,147
    Likes Received:
    0
    But why do some believers hold to such a wicked system in your view? Are they consciously sinning and rejecting the truth? Are they uneducated? Do they purposely twist Scripture?
     
  2. glfredrick

    glfredrick New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    Messages:
    4,996
    Likes Received:
    2

    Precisely... Who else is the Just Judge?

    Now that we have that part of Calvinism straightened out, we can proceed to some of the other issues. :laugh:




    All this talk about "stepping outside" of one's theological perspective is nothing more than the latest fallacy provided by our beloved Skandelon. Do you really think that you can project your own weakness in searching out rival theological positions to the whole of Calvinism? Really? Why is it that your debate always turns to how "stupid" or how "silly" the rest of us are for not grasping the great truth that you alone have figured out? Pride, much?

    Prophetic...
     
    #62 glfredrick, Mar 10, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 10, 2011
  3. Skandelon

    Skandelon <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Messages:
    9,638
    Likes Received:
    1
    Fredrick, I hate to embarrass you like this, but the phrase "shame on you" made me realize you may need a little humility, so I'll proceed to do just that:

    Here is an article from a Reformed professor (Dr. Battle) at the Western Reformed Seminary who teaches, "...for the Calvinists these two terms refer to the same process..." He proceeds to show how Calvinists who do otherwise are inconsistent and he quotes from many credible sources to back up these claims, including but not limited to the Canons of Dort. Many Calvinists here on this board likewise equate the work of regeneration with the "effectual call" or "irresistible grace" and the fact that you don't even seem to be aware of that predominate view among those of the Reformed tradition only goes to reveal your lower "level" of theological knowledge, and your shame in the lack of understanding and education of this particular subject.

    Now, can we drop the "shame game" and discuss actual theology. We obviously have some work to do.
     
  4. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    There could be many reasons. It appeals to the intellect. It is taught by some well known pastors. It's "new" to some. It's an easy system to wrap your mind around...it's all of God. Period. It requires an analytical type person. Excitement in believing a hidden truth most believers do not. Persuasion by others. Who knows all the reasons why.
     
  5. Andy T.

    Andy T. Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2005
    Messages:
    3,147
    Likes Received:
    0
    So, in a word - pride. Pride is the root to most of the reasons you listed above.

    BTW, Skan's system is very intellectual too.
     
  6. glfredrick

    glfredrick New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    Messages:
    4,996
    Likes Received:
    2
    I understand very well, thank you. I made it clear in my post above that I was not speaking about regeneration. If I spaced the OP and missed that part, and you are ASSUMING that I am speaking of regeneration, then I guess that is on both of us, but I have been clear that the issue is not regeneration, but effectual call.

    Do you disagree that there are components to salvation such as election, effectual call, regeneration, adoption, faith/repentence, sanctification, perseverence, and glorification? And, do you disagree that each of these can and must be dealt with in turn, not conflated?
     
  7. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    I think it's notable that word came from you and not me. I do see quite a bit of that trait exhibited on this board, though.

    All of those reasons I listed CAN be that, but not necessarily. I know you will not accept it, but we don't know why one person does one thing and one does another, or the reasons they have formed in their own minds to arrive at such a decision...but it is because of the freedom to choose.
     
  8. Andy T.

    Andy T. Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2005
    Messages:
    3,147
    Likes Received:
    0
    If I were Arminian/Non-Cal, and if I believed all the wicked things that are attributed to Calvinism, the only logical (and Biblical) conclusion would that they are false teachers/prophets and are unsaved. Especially the teachers of it. Spurgeon, Edwards, Piper, MacArthur - are all unsaved is the only consistent position.
     
  9. Andy T.

    Andy T. Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2005
    Messages:
    3,147
    Likes Received:
    0
    For sure! :thumbsup:
     
  10. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    If you hold to a fatalistic determination type theology, I can see why that would be.

    The irony in your statement is the fact the non cal's on this board are openly and in private accused of being lost due to being "self salvationists". This list includes moderators and administrators.

    I have yet to see one non cal accuse a calvinist of being lost, though.
     
  11. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    Skandelon...what is that statement you say about the portion of an argument not addressed again? :D
     
  12. Andy T.

    Andy T. Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2005
    Messages:
    3,147
    Likes Received:
    0
    I didn't know you were making an argument. I just agreed with your statement.
     
  13. Andy T.

    Andy T. Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2005
    Messages:
    3,147
    Likes Received:
    0
    That may be, but I don't see how you can escape the thought when we believe such wicked things. I mean, we categorically believe in a different god than you (or at least the god you attribute to Calvinism). Maybe the lay people you can excuse, but surely not the committed teachers - I don't see how you cannot conclude they are false teachers.
     
  14. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    You show much of the problem above. Neither side grasps absolute truth. We both differ on how absolute truth is arrived at. The fact you see it as two "different gods" is telling...and sad...and wrong.
     
  15. glfredrick

    glfredrick New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    Messages:
    4,996
    Likes Received:
    2
    'Cause you know better? :laugh:
     
  16. glfredrick

    glfredrick New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    Messages:
    4,996
    Likes Received:
    2
    So, let's try your proposition on for size.

    Arminians are rebellious against God because they refuse to allow God to be totally sovereign in His choice of whom is saved and whom is not saved. Therefore, their theology is less than mature, and they lack some understanding of the Scriptures that point to an utterly sovereign God as the sole author and finisher of salvation.
     
  17. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    I can't know better if I can't understand you. :)
     
  18. Andy T.

    Andy T. Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2005
    Messages:
    3,147
    Likes Received:
    0
    But I don't believe we have "different gods." I believe we are brothers. But if I believed the things that you, Skan and others attribute to Calvinism, I couldn't help but to take that stance.
     
  19. Skandelon

    Skandelon <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Messages:
    9,638
    Likes Received:
    1
    I agree with WebDog on his reply to your other post regarding why Calvinists make their errors being "free will." I will elaborate on what I believe leads to those honest interpretive errors if you really want to objectively consider those matters.

    I concede because the gospel has the purpose of informing and calling the regenerate to faith and repentance. The elect still have to hear the message and the gospel being preached is the means God has chosen to bring the elect to faith. I understand that and explained it numerous times to others while I was a Calvinist. But, what purpose do envy and signs accomplish? They are clearly meant to provoke a will to change. They are meant to convince a otherwise unconvinced soul, a purpose not needed in a system where only the effectual work of regeneration can and does accomplish that purpose.

    Or, to be a well educated and objective Calvinist who has fairly weighed both sides of the debate.

    Peace.

    And how I relate to God now versus then.

    And because I better understand why Paul wrote Romans 9 and Eph. 1...and what John 6 means. Once you understand the author's intent from the other perspective it really makes SOOO much more since in light of all the others texts in scripture on the subject. At least it does for me.

    Plus, whether you can tell or not I do practice this skill today just as I did then. I do objectively weigh arguments and sometimes I'll change my take on some things.
     
  20. glfredrick

    glfredrick New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    Messages:
    4,996
    Likes Received:
    2

    What was that about not taking up an argument? Thought so...
     
Loading...