franklinmonroe
Active Member
No, I did not intend this to be a semantic game.John of Japan said:You're kind of playing with words here aren't you? Of course Moses destroyed the Decalogue if the term can mean the physical item--and I believe it can linguistically. If someone burned a Bible you could say, "You destroyed the Bible" while understanding theologically that it exists forever in God's mind...
There might be some circumstances where it could be possible to state that "Moses destroyed the Decalogue" without confusion, but in the context of this discussion (where it had just been stated that God's words are always perfectly preserved in Heaven and in God's mind) it sounded contradictory. That is, until one realizes that you were now speaking of a different type of preservation.
The preservation of God's words in Heaven requires no materials; the preservation of God's words in His mind will not decay, cannot be stolen or destroyed. The preservation of God's word in Heaven and in His mind is perfect, pure, and unchangeable. The preservation of scriptures by placing them in a protective box, or using acid-free archival-quality paper is entirely different.
I don't think that its the conservation of materials that most people are expecting to discuss when addressing the Doctrine (of the Preservation of Scripture). But you clearly understood my point, since you illustrated so precisely that there is a distinction between the medium and the intellectual content.
Last edited by a moderator: