Alex Quackenbush
New Member
This I believe does reflect proper Ecclesiology.Dr. Bob said:Our church services and church life should all rotate around believers (the only ones who comprise the Church) and their growth, edification, strengthening, worship, outreach, etc.
When churches lose their function and become evangelistic centers or revival centers, focused on the UNsaved in the services/programs, they cease being the sanctuary and training pillar and ground of truth.
I believe the flaw here is attempting to use an incomplete historical record to initiate or qualify doctrine.Dr. Bob said:There is not a single incident of an "unsaved" person being in a church service. The only vague support would be in I Corinthians when it speaks of unsaved going by and seeing how the saved act, they would be confused as to the message.
The Bible, as you certainly know, is not a record of every single event of every single church at all times in all places in the apostolic era or post-apostolic era.
An example of this historical flaw method would be someone stating that "not a single incident of Jesus having a bowel movement is recorded in the Bible", so therefore it never happened.
Simply because something isn't recorded it cannot be the determination of what did or did not happen on the whole or what is or isn't allowed. You only know the very limited historical record of those who attended assemblies of believers and frankly no discriminating census of the population of the church service is really given anywhere.
While I do AGREE with you that the assembly of believers is for the edification of believers, it does not require or afford us the opportunity, just because of an extremely limited sketch in the Bible of a tiny portion of church services in the apostolic era, to conclude that the setting cannot be used at some point for the communication of the gospel for the unsaved that are present.