Featured Why I Left the Republican Party

Who cares what you said. The evidence says otherwise. I would say that is simple enough.

 

I'm growing very disgusted with the moderators and administrators of this board.

Really?

This gets an answer?

OK. I'll answer this devil according to his folly. Ban me for calling him (or her) a devil if you want. What is honor among folks who suffer this murderous vomit? It doesn't have to be that judgement scene. What a lame defense.

If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine. And if any mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life, Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, Burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe. —Moses.
​

And I've seen the corrupted interpretations trying to say it wasn't about the fruit, also called a CHILD, but about injury to the woman. That's just B.S. And your breath smells of it.

​

 

You people in Prague owe a lot of reparations for all the lives that you cost. Have you ever compensated the family of Reinhard Heydrich?

 

CTB - I can't fathom the logic you're trying to use.

You say that the judgment scene in Matthew is about how we treat the living, but doesn't mention those that are unborn. Then you say the unborn are living. So your implication is that the passage you mention regards all the living EXCEPT for the unborn.

You specify that the passage is about how we treat others; but apparently ignore that killing others (abortion) is an example of how we treat others.

I am extremely confused about what you actually believe regarding abortion.

 

No it wasn't. It was about hallowing a diabolical practice by wrenching a segment of Scripture from its context.

Yeah it is. Life for a life.

Where are gluttons, harlots and whoremongers mentioned? Think they'll escape judgment?

Actually I have—in the most meaningful way. You mean the unborn are not living. I've shown the light on your hypocrisy while you attempt to escape by employing arbitrary and antichrist hermeneutics to a passage wrenched from its context.

You are attempting to marginalize the life of the unborn. You constantly contrast them to the—in your words—"living." It's the unborn vs the living,

the unborn vs the living

the unborn vs the living

Ever and anon with you, it's the unborn vs the living.

Watch, here it comes again:

I have not mistaken your meaning. No one has.

 

As for the unborn. The Spirit testifies and uses the term "child." The unborn are our fellow men. The weakest of all, and the ones most in need of nurturing and protection. Will our resident Marxists assert that Christ says less about one class of children than another?

Christ entered humanity at conception. In all ways He was made like unto his brethren, and is our substitute from conception to the grave.

 

Didn't help a lick, and here's why: You made the following statement -- "My personal belief is that he believed that how we treated others shows what we believe."

So people who support and even encourage abortion--the killing of unborn children--what does that show you about what they believe?

 

It is not about me, CTB, but about your opinions in Prague. You have said that pro-life means anti-death penalty. Since you represent nearly all Europeans on this topic, I would suppose that you would be against what happened to Reinhard Heydrich on his way to work.

Also, you say that there is no Scripture against abortion--how about Thou shalt not murder?

Finally, CBT, your point about the GOP being for the rich, etc., is becoming increasingly irrelevant as the USA is moving towards a one-party system with only the Democrats left standing as we go to open borders and accept another ten to forty million immigrants from Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Living in Prague, CBT, you probably don't realize how many people from Africa and Asia we already have even in a small place like Indianapolis.

 

No you're not. You are doing as I stated above. I'm done indulging your witless pretenses.

You are pro-abortion.

 

Proverbs 6

16 These six things doth the LORD hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him:
17 A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood,
18 An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief,
19 A false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren.​

HankD​

 

You cannot be pro-life and support Planned Parenthood

 

Oh, I see my error. I thought that the unborn child was alive.

No, I am not pro-life if by that you mean that I would not execute Mussolini, for example.

As for the GOP, they are heading into oblivion. It's a brave new world, CBT, and you will be one of the kings of it.

 

Pretty much the same result, though, isn't it? OK, how about someone who had a trial? Adolf Eichmann. Do you support his execution?

 

Excellent, Don.

Just a side question/observation. C.T.Boy is saying his ambivalence on abortion stems from the lack of scriptural reference to it, yet you saw what he had to say to people who asked him where slavery was called "evil" is the bible.