1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Why Obama Is a Lame Duck

Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by Revmitchell, Aug 21, 2009.

  1. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    39,145
    Ratings:
    +2,367
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Just seven months into his term -- and 14 months before the 2010 midterm election -- and could it be, is President Obama already a lame duck?


    With his passive management style -- which inevitably led to overreaching and heavy-handedness by Congressional Democrats Obama has made himself largely irrelevant on many of the issues he ran on, from health care "reform" to "resetting" our foreign relations. Here are seven signs that Obama's political suasion is waning:


    More Here
     
  2. Aaron

    Aaron Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    15,867
    Ratings:
    +603
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The thing to remember here, that Obama has always been lame. It's the socialist majorities in both houses that are the threat.
     
  3. Magnetic Poles

    Magnetic Poles New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    10,407
    Ratings:
    +0
    Despite Dubya's view, the Presidency is NOT a dictator's position. It is a chief executive office. Agendas must be enacted by Congress.
     
  4. alatide

    alatide New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2009
    Messages:
    974
    Ratings:
    +0
    This is how Fox desperately wants it to be. They distort the truth to make it appear to be the case but it's not true. Another case of the biased media slamming "libs" and "Dems."
     
  5. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    17,699
    Ratings:
    +772
    Faith:
    Baptist
    For about two weeks now I was going to start a thread on this very same subject. That designation is usually reserved for the last year or so in their term because public support has waned. However, in Obama's case he is walking and quacking within his first 6 months.
     
  6. webdog

    webdog Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,691
    Ratings:
    +0
    This is rich :laugh: The "biased" media...the same ones who poisoned America's mind with the Obama love fest has now turned against him? Hardly :laugh:
     
  7. BigBossman

    BigBossman New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2009
    Messages:
    1,008
    Ratings:
    +0
    I don't think I would be ready to refer to Obama as a "lame duck president" just yet. Democrats have control over the House & Senate still. That means that 9 times out of 10, whatever legislation he passes will most likely pass. I would probably refer to Obama as a snake with plenty of venom left.

    Bush on the other hand was a lame duck because, not only was his popularity so low, but toward the end, the Democrats took control of both the Senate & House. It was next to impossible for him to get anything passed.
     
  8. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    17,699
    Ratings:
    +772
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Apples to apples, GWB wasn't a lame duck in any sense for the first 6 or 7 months of his presidency.
     
  9. alatide

    alatide New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2009
    Messages:
    974
    Ratings:
    +0
    Since you bring up Bush, just what did he accomplish during the first 6-7 months of his presidency except to ignore the many indications that a terrorist attack using airplanes to strike tall buildings was a real possibility?
     
  10. just-want-peace

    just-want-peace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2002
    Messages:
    5,655
    Ratings:
    +132
    Faith:
    Baptist
    "They call the wind MARIAH."

    Not what I'd call this blast of hot air, but this is a family board!!:smilewinkgrin::smilewinkgrin:

    The average IQ of this board just dropped considerably with the above quote!:rolleyes:
     
  11. saturneptune

    saturneptune New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    13,977
    Ratings:
    +0
    Listen Mr. Democrat apologist, why does a President or Congress have "to do" something. There is no evidence for your charge. And why are you bashing President Bush? You are obviously of the same liberal mindset as he is.

    You just keep watching the mainstream media to reenforce your belief in a difference between the two parties. That way, you do not have to think for yourself.
     
  12. BigBossman

    BigBossman New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2009
    Messages:
    1,008
    Ratings:
    +0
    True. I was mostly referring toward the end of his second term. Mainly, the last two years. I was also pointing out that I wouldn't be ready to classify Obama as a lame duck just yet. In my view lame ducks just sit around & are unable to do things. He still has the ability to do a lot of damage.
     
    #12 BigBossman, Aug 22, 2009
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 22, 2009
  13. padredurand

    padredurand Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    Messages:
    4,405
    Ratings:
    +66
    Faith:
    Baptist
    A fact lost on Mr. Obama the candidate. Hiw many times did we hear "When I am elected president I will [fill in the blank]."? Come to think of it, how many times have we heard that same line from any potential candidate? Woodrow Wilson promised to keep America out of WWI, Hoover was going to end poverty and LBJ would launching a war against it.

    Too many grandiose promises mugged by harsh reality.
     
  14. LeBuick

    LeBuick New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Messages:
    11,537
    Ratings:
    +0
    I think each candidate forgets there is an opposition party determined to see them fail at all cost. However, LBJ did a great job on poverty. This is from Wiki.

     
Loading...