Why weren't we told the truth about 9/11?

Your President said he was going after Bin Laden. I suppose he is in on this mythical conspiracy.

 

No. Your President is going after Bin Laden. Do you find that strange or just a lack of judgment?

 

Actually, no I didn't. That paragraph is quoted from the website.

Again, the lawyers state that this is an acceptable practice, to ensure that nothing "slips through the cracks" legally. Figure it like this: being the head figure of Al Qaeda, bin Laden may not have had a direct hand in the 9/11 event; so if we charge him with direct involvement, it would fall down legally. The indictment may later read something about "conspiracy to commit," or some such. We're still hunting him (if he isn't already dead). I'm good with that.

If there's evidence that bin Laden did not have anything to do with 9/11, and that we went into Afghanistan and then Iraq specifically for him (which we didn't; we went after Al Qaeda, of which bin Laden is the head figure) ... then your suspicions might have merit. As it is, all you're doing is wasting electrons.

 

http://articles.latimes.com/2006/apr/05/nation/na-ksm5

During the trial of Moussaoui, interrogation records showed the "architect of 9/11" stated that bin Laden had knowledge, and was giving orders regarding 9/11.

So we have evidence (some might argue that statements obtained during interrogations are questionable; however, read the article and the tone in which Mohammed is described as "gloating" over his achievement) that bin Laden knew and was involved; and, being the "head" of Al Qaeda, therefore takes ultimate responsibility.

So why hasn't the FBI charged him? Ask them.

 

Do you agree with the Rosie O'Donnell who insisted fire couldn't melt steel?

 

:BangHead:

How did the fire burn wiith such an intensity as to melt steel? Not a whole lot of structural fires are given JET FUEL as an accelerant. AND decades of asbestos removal, floor by floor, left the steel girders unprotected with ANYTHING.

Anybody seen FarenHYPE 911? Its Dick Morris' rebuttal to the nonsense spewed by Moore in his "documentary".

Including why Bush wasn't "rushed from the room," and "The T.V. Reporter, who never saw a plane hit the Pentagon."

A. Staffers, as calmly as possible, ended Bush's school visit when there was a logical break. Since yelling, drawing weapons, and dragging the Prez from the room under kevlar body shields might (just maybe) traumatize some in the room, and cause panic among the T.V. viewers, they chose the quieter method.

B. The reporter who claimed there was "no plane which hit the pentagon." Says that is a flat-out lie... he never said it. He even shows the entire, **UNEDITED** tape of his report and proves he never said it. Instead, moments of his report were taken out of context and cleverly spliced together again, with images of the devastation laid over the cuts to conceal them, in order to prey on certain impressionable people's wilder fancies.

I, personally, don't give a rat's patoot what Bin Laden's wanted poster says... the evil jerk says, himself, he did it and that's good enough for me.

Furthermore... I think the creation of such disgusting stories as these "theories" is demeaning to the memory of the dead killed in such evil acts, and an insult to the people who are now hunting them (the perpetrators) down.

Now welcome me to the site! :tongue3:

 

Welcome to the site !!!!!!! :wavey:


Excellent first post.

 

Thank you, thank you... I'm glad to be here. Excellent forum so far, but this thread is, as yet, the only one which got me riled enough to post...

I'm kinda shy

 

Not at all. They could be delusional, high, stoned, stupid, or suffer from an unnatural need for attention.

Then why quote her material?

If you believe what you're posting, then you both are on equal footing when it comes to structural engineering.

Give me one instance of a structural test in which this exact scenario ocurred. They couldn't know if it would withstand it. It had never had to.

Then congratulations on your complete break with rational thought.

Let me guess. Bush did it.

Yeah, yeah...and a plane has never landed safely in the Hudson River, so it can't be done. :laugh:

Simply amazing that (1) you know all the details; and (2) they didn't get your permission.

This is your silliest post ever.

 

Steel will burn quite well too.

 

Now you're just speculating. What makes you a bigger authority than anyone else? It wasn't Moussaoui who said anything about bin Laden or 9/11; it was Mohammed, who was the planner behind it. Who was also challenging bin Laden for control of Al Qaeda. Who was gloating about how successful his plan was, and was derogatory about how bin Laden kept messing it up. And he wasn't the only testimony that implicated bin Laden having knowledge of the event well before it happened.

So really, who cares what you believe?

You've got questions, but you have no evidence to support your questions. Just about all of your original premises and websites have been countered with opposite views. Find some actual evidence, instead of conjecture, speculation, and "I believe" crapola, and convince us that something more needs to be done.

You'll pardon me, but with this post, I believe you've ended the topic.

 

No it is not strange! In fact it would have been stupid, the sort of thing the liberals would love, the sort of thing that Clinton did after the 1st Trade center bombing.

Did we indict the Japanese Emperor after Pearl Harbor. No we went to war against the perpetrators just as we did after the Trade Center bombings.

You are cleverly devious JC. You start a thread that initially appears innocous to encourage participation and then you introduce your hair brained conspiracy theories. But what can we expect from radical leftists.