1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Your personal "perfect Bible" opinion

Discussion in '2003 Archive' started by Jesus is Lord, Apr 14, 2003.

?
  1. Masoretic Text (OT) & Textus Receptus (NT)

    78.0%
  2. Masoretic Text (OT) & Majority Text (NT)

    19.5%
  3. Masoretic Text (OT) & Nestle-Aland (NT)

    2.4%
  4. Other text I consider to be better than the texts mentioned above

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. Jesus is Lord

    Jesus is Lord New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2002
    Messages:
    260
    Ratings:
    +0
    If you had to choose a Bible version you have to use exclusively , which translation would that be?
     
  2. Terry_Herrington

    Terry_Herrington New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Messages:
    4,455
    Ratings:
    +1
    I don't know about the underlying text. If forced to use only one translation I would use the NIV.
     
  3. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    29,478
    Ratings:
    +84
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The modern texts also include the variants (such as the TR) so would opt for it "all in one package".

    Of course, I filled out the poll wrong but hey, I'm a slow learner!
     
  4. Preacher Nathan Knight

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2003
    Messages:
    178
    Ratings:
    +0
    I would choose the 1611 King James Version.
     
  5. go2church

    go2church Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2002
    Messages:
    4,304
    Ratings:
    +16
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You don't use the 1611 now (educated guess)!
    I would use ESV
     
  6. Jude

    Jude <img src=/scott3.jpg>

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2001
    Messages:
    2,680
    Ratings:
    +0
    The RSV...it also has the apocrypha. If I could find an ESV with the apocrypha (which will be published, I understand, in the UK)I would have it.
     
  7. MissAbbyIFBaptist

    MissAbbyIFBaptist <img src=/3374.jpg>

    Joined:
    May 3, 2002
    Messages:
    2,567
    Ratings:
    +0
    King James Athourized Version!
     
  8. Preacher Nathan Knight

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2003
    Messages:
    178
    Ratings:
    +0
    actually i do use the 1611 KJV. that is all i use. so much for educated guesses.
     
  9. neal4christ

    neal4christ New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2002
    Messages:
    1,815
    Ratings:
    +0
    Like go2church said, you probably don't use this, nor would you. I would be impressed if you could read it and you would have to have a Bible with the Apocrypha, which I am guessing you don't use. You probably meant to say "the 1769 King James Version." ;)

    Neal
     
  10. Clay Knick

    Clay Knick New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2002
    Messages:
    220
    Ratings:
    +0
    This is such a tough question.

    I would choose the RSV because
    I know it so well.

    But I really love the ESV, NASB,
    and NIV. I love the NIV for
    reading.

    Again, a tough question.

    Clay
     
  11. Johnv

    Johnv New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2001
    Messages:
    21,321
    Ratings:
    +0
    If I had to choose only one, I'd choose the Greek and Hebrew, with a good Greek and Hebrew dictionary.

    [ April 14, 2003, 06:14 PM: Message edited by: Johnv ]
     
  12. IfbReformer

    IfbReformer New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2002
    Messages:
    708
    Ratings:
    +0
    If I were going to another planet where there would be no other Bibles I would take the NASB. Why, because it is the most literal best preserved(in my opinion) text.

    However, having said that, we probably won't be going to another planet and there will always be more literal translations around for preservation purposes so If I had to choose only one translation for its translation to the common man's english I would have to choose the NIV.

    IFBReformer
     
  13. IfbReformer

    IfbReformer New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2002
    Messages:
    708
    Ratings:
    +0
  14. Daniel Dunivan

    Daniel Dunivan New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2002
    Messages:
    374
    Ratings:
    +0
    A question for the survey questions :eek:
    What about other OT texts that vary from the MT? i.e. Qumran's variations on Jeremiah that testify to a version of Jeremiah that is more like the LXX.

    Does anyone know of a critical text of the OT that incorporates these new finds? I know that many of the more recent translations opt for readings that come from Qumran or the Samaritan Penteteuch, but I am unaware of a critical text like the NT has in the Nestle-Aland.

    Grace and Peace, Danny [​IMG]
     
  15. Doubting Thomas

    Doubting Thomas Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2003
    Messages:
    2,618
    Ratings:
    +19
    I'd pick the 1982 NEW King James Version (amen)! I believe that it is the Word of God preserved intact in English for today's man (and woman). [​IMG]
    Plus it has good footnotes pointing out the textual variants in the OT and the NT.
     
  16. Forever settled in heaven

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2000
    Messages:
    1,770
    Ratings:
    +0
    that's odd, there weren't any Versions in the choices.

    u're wasting our time.
     
  17. Sherrie

    Sherrie New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Messages:
    10,274
    Ratings:
    +0
    The Hebrew-Greek Key Study Bible KJV 1984 revised 1991.


    Sherrie [​IMG]
     
  18. Paul Wayne

    Paul Wayne New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    6
    Ratings:
    +0
  19. Jesus is Lord

    Jesus is Lord New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2002
    Messages:
    260
    Ratings:
    +0
    My question is about the translation you would use. I am sorry that my English is not good enough to explain what I meant. I was talking about the text you´d like to have good translation from.

    By the way, wasting your time is something only you can do... by your decision to read my post and to answer my poll. :cool:
     
  20. Slambo

    Slambo New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    197
    Ratings:
    +0
    Ditto..
     
Loading...