Separate names with a comma.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Well, as soon as the Lord gets that message to me...then we will talk
No on two fronts. I couldn't affirm the 2000 BF&M and I wouldn't use a "what we do believe" confession, which is hardly detailed enough to be used...
thank you
It looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, what you got there is "security inquiry" - said no one ever!
John, Inspired yes, concerning verbal plenary, I would say no. Thought that was implied in my answer, when I said mode is not essential....
TCassidy, Good summary. Interestingly, have only encountered one individual (that I can remember) that held to position 3, dictation. They went...
I understand, but would you consider either of those groups "evangelical"?
Didn't side step, said mode wasn't essential. Plenty of folks consider themselves evangelical without affirming plenary inspiration. But you knew...
Inspiration yes, but mode of inspiration is not an essential doctrine. The word "inerrancy" requires the qualifiers, and clarifications. Textual...
Don't worry if you think this a bit ridiculous. It's as likely to as productive as The Great Commission Task Force!
I'm not telling you that you're "wrong" to believe in internal inerrancy. Though I think it is a unnecessarily decisive and unprovable theory. I'm...
Not playing games. "Internal inerrancy" seems to me to be the game. The inerrancy games continue.
See post #65
Not being the same thing as inerrant, I have and actually affirm the infallibility of the bible, no argument from me. My issue is that variants...
One variant, that's all it takes. Any variants?
Can be infallible without having to be inerrant. If so, not essential.
Okay. My point was that John extended inerrancy to a copy, beyond the originals. They aren't the same, that's the point. TCassidy ended his last...
John said he was holding in his hands an inerrant copy, thus my reference to manuscripts. Planets and such are reference to what TCassidy wrote...
I don't know of anyone who claims inerrancy for the manuscripts. The ridiculousness of such has been pretty well established. Now If you are...
It's not simple to believe inerrancy, even those who claim to be inerrantist can't agree on what it means. If it only applies to originals it's...