Featured KJV 2

Hi, Mr. Kinney!

I have a Cambridge Edition, straight from Britain, complete with Crown copyright, so I know it's genuine. GUESS WHAT? It has the same goofs & booboos found in any other KJV(NOT "KJB") edition, such as "Easter" in Acts 12:4, "the love of money is THE root of ALL evil" in 1 Tim. 6:10, "Thou shalt not KILL" in Ex. 20:13, & the ADDITION of the words "and shalt be" in Rev. 16:5. (You CANNOT show us ANY ancient Greek ms. of Rev that has those words in that verse.)

So now you're saying older English Bible translations had mistakes in them? Well, what makes you think they were all eliminated in the KJV? The "Easter" goof was carried over from older versions. (Though a prelate or prelates, not the translators may have added it later. No matter HOW it got there, it's still a goof!)

The KJVO myth was invented by Satan to cause strife & dissent among & between congregations. He was able to influence people such as CULT OFFICIAL Dr. Ben Wilkinson, to write pro-KJVO material & a couple who claimed to be Baptist preachers, J. J. Ray, & Dr. D. O. Fuller, to legally but dishonestly plagiarize Dr. W's book. So, the cultic, dishonest origin of the current edition of the KJVO myth proves its Satanic invention.

Texts & manuscripts? GOD PRESERVED ALLOF THEM we have now, & others we haven't found yet. Just recently, some more Dead Sea scrolls were found. Who can prove any of them wrong, as we weren't there when they were made, & we don't know who made most of them, when or where, or what sources they used.

Yes, the KJVO myth is based upon guesswork, & placing one's trust in men, not GOD.

 

And don't forget LANGUAGE CHANGES. Those processes are still going on. They did NOT end with the KJV by any means !

Until better versions were made.

Can YOU? We have pointed out & proven goofs & booboos in the KJV elsewhere in this forum.

And YOU'RE not gonna **PROVE** your KJVO myth, either!

 

Roby, we all know you are a version rummaging Bible agnostic who does not believe any bible in any language you can show us is now or ever was the complete and inerrant words of God.


You see "errors" where none exist, and will continue to do so till you die.


Easter is absolutely correct in Acts 12:4. The Greek word paska has two meanings. One is Passover and the other is Easter. Look it up in any Greek dictionary.

If my website still works (it was down earlier) here is why Easter is correct.
https://brandplucked.webs.com/easter.htm

And here is why 1 Timothy 6:10 is right.
Another King James Bible Believer

And Exodus 20:13.

Another King James Bible Believer

And here is why Revelation 16:5 is right in the KJB.

Another King James Bible Believer

Folks, keep firmly in mind the FACT that no one who is not KJB only by default do not believe that any Bible in any language they can show us is in fact the inerrant words of God.

Some few have their faculties unhinged to the degree that they will list 3 or 4 different bible versions that differ among themselves by hundreds or even thousands of words, and different meanings, names and numbers, and try to tell us that they are all inerrant.

They are Humpty Dumpty Christians who make words mean anything they want them to mean.

Just ask them to show you a copy of this inerrant Bible they supposedly believe in and see what they do.

"He that hath ears to hear, let him hear." Luke 8:8

God bless.

 

Mr. Kinney, I'm interested to see how you explain the FACT that NO ancient Greek manuscript of Revelation contains the words "and shalt be" in Rev. 16:5. Several other KJVOs here have fallen flat on their snoots trying to get by that ADDITION of words in the KJV.

I have seen plenty of evidence that Beza did a "conjectural emendation" in his Textus Receptus edition. He had NO ANCIENT GREEK MS to copy from; apparently he just decided it "sounded good" & added it. But I believe we all know God commanded to NOT add nor subtract from His word, and while those words are doctrinally-correct, they're NOT written in any manuscript at that verse!

While we can't blame the AV makers for that one, it DOES disprove any special inspiration for the KJV, as, if God were providing such inspiration, He would've caused the AV men to have left those words out. (Remember, that's only ONE of many imperfections in the KJV !)

 

Thanks! I was wondering how long it was gonna take you to use your fave incorrect catchphrase!

All the Scriptural mss are. NO translation is perfect, as all are the products of God's perfect word handled by imperfect men.

No, you're as a football coach who calls the samer play over & over even though it fails every time. You don't see errors that have been **PROVEN** by many pundits.

I know what it means TODAY. What matters in Acts is what it meant to LUKE & the recipients of his letter. Remember, pascha is the word JESUS is quoted as using for passover. (Unless you believe He observed Easter! LOL)

I've read all your articles, & I could write a book on their mistakes! (Yes, unfortunately, your site's still down!)

And ALSO keep in mind that GOD never promised us a simon-pure translation, and that the KJV (NOT "KJB") is far-from-perfect!

And most of your "proof" of errors is that they're worded differently from the KJV. Circular reasoning.
"I have a fast red car."
"I have a red fast car."
"I have a car that can go fast & is colored red."
"I have a car colored red that cn go fast."
Same exact message, different words.

Yes-we call them "KJVOs".

Just ask a KJVO to show us any SCRIPTURAL SUPPORT for his/her KJVO myth.

God Bless you as well ! Perhaps He will open your eyes to the falsehood of the KJVO myth some day! (I bear you no ill will. I hope all goes well for you & yours, except in the matter of hawking a false doctrine.)

 

Did God have his word before the Kjv? why MUST we have an inerrant bible to have the word of the lord to us?

 

Hi JonC. You have two problems here. First of all, you have NO single Greek text or manuscript you can show us that you really believe is the complete and inerrant words of God. Your Critical (Condition) Text is constantly changing and even they tell us it is not final. You simply have NO inerrant Bible to believe in that you can show us.


That is just where you are right now. And the second thing I have often seen. Those who do not believe any bible is inerrant, often capitalize the word Word of God when referring to the Bible. The Word of God is the Lord Jesus, and the word of God is the inspired words that tell us about who the Word of God is and what he did and taught and how he redeemed his people from our sins. Without the word of God we know nothing about the Word of God.


And many of the fake bible version pervert the true revelation of who the Word of God is.


Here are a couple examples.

Many modern version proponents tell us “No Fundamental Doctrines Are Changed”

But this is not true at all.

In direct contrast to the King James Bible, many modern versions teach the following false doctrines -


God can be DECEIVED by men (NASB, NET, Legacy Standard Bible)
https://brandplucked.webs.com/ps7836deceivegod.htm


The Son of God had “ORIGINS from ancient times” (NIV, ESV, NET)

http://brandplucked.webs.com/micah52heb211origin.htm


The KJB teaches that "Messiah (was) cut off, but NOT FOR HIMSELF”,
but versions like the ESV, NIV, NASB teach that “the anointed one shall be cut off AND SHALL HAVE NOTHING."
http://brandplucked.webs.com/dan926messiahcutoff.htm


Jesus LIED about what he was going to do. (ESV, NASB, NIV)
http://brandplucked.webs.com/john78didjesuslie.htm


There was a day when Jesus BECAME the Son of the Father (NIV, NET, Holman)
http://brandplucked.webs.com/acts1333thisdaybegotte.htm


"He that hath ears to hear, let him hear." Luke 8:8
God bless.

 

'If the TR contained errors then the KJV should as well'

The KJV translators took care of the 1.0% variants in the TR editions and refined them in the KJV.

And Jon, why do these posts close down? Is this some kind of censorship?

 

Why is it closing? is there a reason for this?

 

Hi Roby. I don't think you actually read my article I gave you on Revelation 16:5. There is quite a bit of support for this reading, but you did not actually read the article.

Another King James Bible Believer

There is some textual support and early witness to the reading found in the KJB. It is a minority reading, to be sure, but for every one minority reading in the KJB there are 20 of them in the fake bible versions you like so much, but don't really believe are inerrant.

Had you actually read the article you would see that your Critical Text editors make changes in their Greek text, and the one they just did in the Nestle-Aland 28th edition in 2 Peter 3:10 which is based on ZERO Greek manuscripts.

Plus your Vatican Versions like the ESV, NIV, NASB several times reject the clear Hebrew readings, and sometimes even when the so called Septuagint agrees with the Hebrew, and will go with one foreign language reading found in the Syriac.

So, is this type of thing OK when YOU guys do it, but not OK when the greatest Bible ever printed does it? Is that how it works, Roby?

See what your modern scholarship is really like here-
2 Peter 3:10 and modern “scholarship”

http://brandplucked.webs.com/na27th28theditions.htm

 

The only thing I do 'blindly' is I have blind faith in the word of God and His promises of divine preservation, even in a translation (Psalms 12:6-7) KJV.

 

Because God said so, and everthing God does is perfect.

So the NASB20 finally got it right in the year 2021? Does this mean there will be no more updates?