Covid Hysteria

that seems to be a distinction without a difference.

what I meant was ... reference my paper again ... when these things were rolling out last fall/winter, there was a question about the period of time a person's body would produce the spike proteins. There was no known answer to that question. I'm asking, now, that the boosters are here (for 65/over right now in the US ... just because it's not "all skate" doesn't make it "not promoted.") ... does that represent the period when the "native" spike protein production stops/significantly reduces for it is this spike protein production which is SUPPOSED to keep the immune system active and thereby provides the "robust response" to a viral challenge of SARS Cov2 "in the wild."

 

so what is the answer to that question?

this wasn't available in any of the sources I cited.

How long does the body produce the spike proteins?

One feature which HAS caught the medical community by surprise ... the spike proteins are EVERYWHERE, not simply confined to a single system (circulatory) ... nor specific place (site of injection) ... trillions of these spike proteins. And for approximately 4 weeks (give or take) ... the injected is expelling some of these spike proteins in their exhalations.

I've experienced the result of this. It's not pleasant.

 

Hmm. this isn't what Dr. Malone said (inventor of the mRNA technology) ... nor the veterinarian immunologists I consulted who'd been developing this over the last decade. They said "indefinite" ... the presence of the spike proteins to attack is what keeps the immune system in "Cell Mediated Response" over simply innate status on these.

Pfizer didn't know that information when the EUA was issued by the FDA.

 

I don't think they know. My doc told me she was seeing levels at around 300 at 6 months in most vaxed.. Level should be 2500. I don't know exactly what that means, but 300 ain't 2500.

 

I'm getting caught between pages ...

but post number 20, I asked about the duration of spike protein generation ... because this wasn't available. I recognize you've stated otherwise, but it was part of the information which Pfizer did NOT release because they didn't know. They'd only run two trials which overlapped in a single 90 day period ... and the production outlasted THAT.

I'll dig up my notes on the paper I wrote, but I assure you I didn't "make up" that question. It was one posed by the vet immunologist in THEIR decade PLUS (before Moderna) of work.

I respect the fact you desire to mitigate these questions as an apparent answer would presume to reduce the hesitancy; to take a vaccine against a disease which has an overall >99% recovery rate.

just doesn't pass the smell test.

 

is this referring to antibody levels?

Let's not overlook the fact the void of antibodies does NOT mean no immunity. This is a ruse in the retort to accept natural immunity over the cv vax immunity. "oh, no antibodies, roll-up yer sleeve"

Incorrect. A cell-mediated response is going to put that virus in the B-cell inventory, so to speak. Without an active challenge, plus perhaps a few weeks, there's going to be no SARS Cov2 antibodies in the immune system, but the innate response AS WELL as the standby "cell mediated" DOES have the capability ... until the spike proteins are self-produced, then that natural immunity is severely compromised.

IDK how immunity could be tested short of being intentionally exposed to the virus and then check for antibodies ... but the overall response to this pestilence has revealed MUCH about were we are on the timeline of man's dominion of the planet.

Hint ... we are at the very end. Prepare for a "change of command" ceremony. spoiler alert ... the first spirit to dominate isn't benevolent.

 

I think the focus needs to be on prevention for the susceptible ... and treatment for the infected with something more than "go home until you turn blue" so then we intubate (introduce secondary bacterial infection) on someone with a clear wind pipe.

Stop demonizing proven outpatient treatments. If we'd done THIS from the beginning, we'd still have grandma/grandpa ...we'd still have our jobs. We'd all have burned some sick time last spring/early summer and been done with it.

but ... remember all the bellyachin about universal mail-in ballots --- EVEN before the party parties (conventions). Hmm. that's not indicative of collusion is it? I mean, even Fauci was saying in May '20 the summer time would "burn it." EG ... maximum vitamin D season.

But ... all that is water under the bridge and we still have people driving around solo wearing a mask ... or outside by themselves ... wearing a mask. Advertising. it's effective. Sell a snow cone to an Eskimo.

 

i think this is completely wrong and it's based in this deal about being "fully vaxed." If not, then the death isn't counted against the cv vax.

definitions again. See?

 

The CDC report (I'm on my phone so allowance please) ... doesn't attribute deaths to the cv vax until after the person is fully cv vaxed PLUS two weeks. Most of the deaths to the cv vax are inside that "window." Long term effects still unknown because it's only been 17 months since the cv vax even existed. 14 months since the end of the abbreviated trial period ... and ... 10 months since the rollout to the public.

There's still MUCH to go wrong with this stunt. And will.

We know from the messup in South Carolina ... there are vials of saline solution labeled "cv vax" ... I pray you get either miraculous protection ... or was part of the control group which unknowingly got the saline jab lot.

 

I don't claim any expertise on this, but my doc said the antibody to the spike protein level of what the emphasis is now on. The test code is 164090.

 

What if there is no ‘covid 19’? It has yet to be isolated. What we do know is many people are suffering & expiring from the ‘cure’.



The data, as of October 3, 2020, speaks for itself:

DISTRIBUTION




HERE COMES A VERY TROUBLING PART: