9/11 Revisited

I am not dealing with only John Farmer who said that the 9/11 Commission Report was almost entirely untrue.

I am am giving fact after fact regarding that day that goes wholly against the government-sponsored work of fiction.

Which means the subject is up for discussion since planes did not bring down those three buildings --they were demolished by controlled demolition. Pay attention to the real experts : Architects And Engineers For 9/11 Truth.

It is most certainly NOT a fact.

You consistently ignore the subject of Building Seven...how odd of you. It's like you feel uncomfortable about that issue or something.

 

Regarding the Pentagon incident on 9/11, here are some witnesses:

Bob Pugh --photographer:
"I'm looking for wreckage...I can't see anything that I recognize. I can't see the tail, I can't see the wheels. I can't see the engine. There's no chairs, there's no luggage, there's no logo...The largest piece I saw was maybe 2 by three feet...The foam trucks were beginning to show up...[the hole] was 16 feet diameter, 20 feet tops."

Lt. Robert Medairos --Watch Commander of the day
" They said it was a plane, and I didn't see any pieces of any plane, and I couldn't believe a plane hit the building."

Barbara Honegger --military affairs journalist, reported in her personal capacity that a pilot sent by Gen. Larry Arnold (NORAD) "reported back that there was no evidence that a plane had hit the building."

Major Douglas Rokke U.S. Army (Ret.)
"No aircraft hit the Pentagon. Totally impossible! You couldn't make the turns with a 757. You couldn't fly it over the light poles. You couldn't even get it that close to the ground because of turbulence."

 

Regarding the Pentagon incident:There was aDept. of Defense briefing the next day --September 12.
There was no mention whatsoever of "Flight 77"," Boeing 757", or "American Airlines."

 

There is nothing there. Can't see anything in your post.

Please give some substance to your post.

 

First reports, always wrong.

 

For years, I watched cases in the news that I was investigating. Their lack of accuracy was staggering. If 10 people see something happen, when interviewed, they saw 10 different things.

Our government is capable of anything. They had no need to manufacture 9/11.

 

That has happened many times.have you looked at the Ariel photos of
Fighter crashes in Vietnam? They don't disappear, they bury themselves.

 

How about this one for starters? The cellphone calls that were described as taking place between aircraft flying at altitude and the ground were technically impossible. They didn't happen. Want to go on?

 

The hole in the Pentagon wasn't large enough for an aircraft like the one assumed to penetrate. Where did the wings go and actually more specifically where is the damage that would have been done by the engines? They would have caused more of an impact damage than the nose of the aircraft.

 

The people of New York voted to have a much more thorough investigation than the one that was done. That request was blocked by a Federal Judge. Why did Bush and Cheney refuse to be interrogated under oath by the commission? Why was the President seemingly not concerned when he was told about the impact of the second plane and just went on listening to a story about a pet goat? Why didn't the Secret Service immediately pick him up and rush him out of the building. Bush said later he thought the U.S. was under attack. If so, the Secret Service's job was to get him out of harm's way immediately. He was a sitting duck in a known location and could easily have been killed if we were under attack. Why couldn't the nation with the strongest military in the world scramble aircraft to intercept the hijacked places after they went o9ff their transponder? That was the protocol. We couldn't protect our two most important cities from this attack? There was plenty of time to do so. These questions go on and on and on.

 

They were made on airphones. I talked on them all the time in flight back in that era.