1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

House Dem now sees no 'value' in impeachment, as polls show falling support among independents

Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by Revmitchell, Nov 26, 2019.

  1. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Michigan Democratic Rep. Brenda Lawrence, a prominent supporter of Kamala Harris who has previously supported the impeachment inquiry into President Trump, abruptly announced Sunday that she no longer saw any "value" in the process and called for her fellow Democrats to throw their support behind a symbolic censure resolution.

    Lawrence's about-face came as polls have shown that independents are souring on the idea of impeaching and removing Trump from office, including in critical battleground states like Wisconsin, even as House Democrats aggressively presented their focus-group-tested "bribery" case against the president over the past two weeks.

    "We are so close to an election," Lawrence said Sunday on a Michigan radio program, noting that Trump stands little chance of being convicted by the GOP-controlled Senate. "I will tell you, sitting here knowing how divided this country is, I don't see the value of taking him out of office. But I do see the value of putting down a marker saying his behavior is not acceptable. It's in violation of the oath of office of a president of the United States, and we have to be clear that you cannot use your power of the presidency to withhold funds to get a foreign country to investigate an American citizen for your own personal gain. There's no way around that."

    House Dem now sees no 'value' in impeachment, as polls show falling support among independents
     
  2. RighteousnessTemperance&

    RighteousnessTemperance& Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2017
    Messages:
    7,359
    Likes Received:
    1,464
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Interestingly, she attempted to walk back these comments not long afterward, saying she stands behind the push to impeach. She was obviously forced back into lockstep formation. As the Mob Boss Pelosi likes to intimate, Dems don't allow diversity, they just talk as if they do.
     
  3. HankD

    HankD Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    26,977
    Likes Received:
    2,536
    Faith:
    Baptist
    the plan was presumption of guilt with appropriate punishment until evidence of a crime or treason or a high misdemeanor was found ala the book TheTrial by Franz Kafka.

    no evidence has been found but verdict and punishment remain the same by demand as under guilty verdict.
     
  4. robycop3

    robycop3 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    14,362
    Likes Received:
    668
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I've said many times a few top Dems KNOW the Senate jon't come close to finding Trump guilty if he's impeached, & they don't want to eat the voter backlash. However, Pelosi & crew just can't bring themselves to dump the impeachment idea.

    OK, let's say for the sake of discussion that Trump actually DID order funds withheld from Ukraine til they did as he asked. How criminal is that ? Has it ever been done before ?

    My answer to my first rhetorical question: I can't find anything criminal in a POTUS's withholding any foreign aid for any reason. POTUS has that authority.

    My answer to next question: We need look no further than FDR's dealings with Churchill during WW2, both before & after the US became involved in it. Several times, FDR implied, without actually directly threatening, that he'd withhold destroyers & merchantmen he'd promised the British to help them fight the dire threat of the German U-boats to their shipping lifeline, so vital to an island nation, unless the British undertook counter-offensives against the Axis in the manner the US wished. later, FDR implied that he'd shift the main US effort to the Pacific unless Britain agreed to a landing directly into France in 1944. (The British had wanted to wait til 1945.)

    Now, did anyone cry "Foul !" then ? Of course not ! Churchill knew the British were beleaguered & woulda been in danger of having to seek a truce or armistice with Germany
     
    • Useful Useful x 1
  5. HankD

    HankD Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    26,977
    Likes Received:
    2,536
    Faith:
    Baptist
    IMO i still believe an off-ramp will miraculously appear down the impeachment expressway and the GLOBALISTS will take it to avoid the unpredictable path otherwise.
     
  6. Ziggy

    Ziggy Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2004
    Messages:
    1,162
    Likes Received:
    163
    Faith:
    Baptist
    One good thing if the House votes to impeach and the Senate does not convict: the Democrats won't be able to use the same charges again in any future impeachment attempt.
     
Loading...