1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Search Results for Query: "Genesis 22:12"

  1. The following words were not included in your search because they are too short, too long, or too common: 22, 12
Search Again
Page 1 of 2
  1. Scarlett O.
    Post

    How should one have believed differently?

    Even the devil's "believe" and they tremble. But they aren't and will not be saved. Belief can be mere head knowledge without true faith that...
    Post by: Scarlett O., Jan 6, 2024 in forum: Calvinism & Arminianism Debate
  2. 37818
    Post

    How should one have believed differently?

    I am not sure I understand how you mean one should believe differently? Abraham was justified without works, per Genesis 15:6. And Abraham was...
    Post by: 37818, Jan 6, 2024 in forum: Calvinism & Arminianism Debate
  3. CJP69
    Post

    Corporate Election

    It's open theism, if it's coming from me. It most definitely is not Pelagiansim. As for God's foreknowledge. God knows all knowable things, that...
    Post by: CJP69, Dec 22, 2023 in forum: Calvinism & Arminianism Debate
  4. 37818
    Post

    Romans 8:1-4 2 views

    James 2:21, ". . . Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar? . . . " Abraham was originally...
    Post by: 37818, Dec 15, 2023 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  5. CJP69
    Post

    Not open theism.

    Open Theism is NOT based on this verse. The plain reading of this verse merely supports the doctrine. Your reading your doctrine into the text...
    Post by: CJP69, Oct 16, 2023 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  6. taisto
    Post

    Not open theism.

    From what I have read here, open theism is being based on taking Genesis 22:12 out of context and applying it to force all of the Bible to fit a...
    Post by: taisto, Oct 15, 2023 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  7. 37818
    Post

    Not open theism.

    And your view of my view. Biblical theology? You do not like my understanding of: Genesis 22:12 based on John 1:18. And: Mark 13:32 with Acts of...
    Post by: 37818, Oct 14, 2023 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  8. CJP69
    Post

    Not open theism.

    So what? No one has suggested that there aren't distinctions between the members of the godhead. That doesn't mean that you get to believe in...
    Post by: CJP69, Oct 14, 2023 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  9. 37818
    Post

    Not open theism.

    Acts 1:24 is not Acts 1:7. The three references, had somethings held by the Father, distinct from the Son. The Trinity are distinct Persons....
    Post by: 37818, Oct 13, 2023 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  10. CJP69
    Post

    Not open theism.

    You resonded too fast! :) I changed it to, "It doesn't work." and I'm referring to the entire line of thinking. It is irrational, beginning with...
    Post by: CJP69, Oct 12, 2023 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  11. 37818
    Post

    Not open theism.

    What are you claiming makes no sense? Yes, John 1:18 uses the term. No. An actual conclusiom is never a-prori. How? How do you hear the LORD...
    Post by: 37818, Oct 12, 2023 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  12. CJP69
    Post

    Not open theism.

    This simply does not work. Do you understand what the term "eisegesis" means? (That is a real question. No implied insult is intended.) It...
    Post by: CJP69, Oct 12, 2023 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  13. JesusFan
    Post

    Not open theism.

    Post by: JesusFan, Sep 30, 2023 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  14. 37818
    Post

    Not open theism.

    Throws out Mark 13:32 with Acts of the Apostles 1:7 explanation. Then why did Yahweh in Genesis 22:12, say ". . . now I know . . . , " having...
    Post by: 37818, Sep 29, 2023 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  15. JesusFan
    Post

    Not open theism.

    Yahweh, Father Jesus and the Holy Spirit were and are all knowing period
    Post by: JesusFan, Sep 29, 2023 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  16. 37818
    Post

    Not open theism.

    Genesis 22:12, per John 1:18. Was before His incarnation.
    Post by: 37818, Sep 28, 2023 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  17. JesusFan
    Post

    Not open theism.

    Actually, Jesus remained fully God, just chose to not know while on earth, but now fully knows all things period!
    Post by: JesusFan, Sep 28, 2023 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  18. 37818
    Post

    Not open theism.

    We do not agree. There is no explaining to you anything. Fine. It seems to me you cannot understand my view either.
    Post by: 37818, Sep 28, 2023 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  19. Van
    Post

    Not open theism.

    Why did you state your actual view, as errant as it may be, in post # 11? Which Omniscient are you claiming? Did you say? Nope. Why not...
    Post by: Van, Sep 28, 2023 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
  20. 37818
    Post

    Not open theism.

    NO. God the Father is fully omniscient. The Son as God's temporal agent is who learned. Or why have the Son of God? John 1:2. John 1:3, John...
    Post by: 37818, Sep 28, 2023 in forum: Baptist Theology & Bible Study
Showing results 1 to 20 of 40 Next >
Search Again
Page 1 of 2