Separate names with a comma.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
So you have found my personal study website, that is good to know :Biggrin:Cool
Again, ANDREW ANSELL had some thoughts on this. :Whistling ... Good stuff to play around, at: Jesus as Θεός (God): A Textual Examination. (can...
Glenn Conjurske maintained that the work of Benjamin Blayney was “carried out haphazardly and inconsistently” (Bible Version, p. 62). The 1769...
(2) Virgin Birth of Christ – Matthew 1:25; Luke 2:33 (KJB) And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name...
Scrivener's 1873 Cambridge edition was reprinted by Zondervan in 2000 and in several years following and then later was reprinted by Hendrickson...
Just using the first examples from hundreds in the New Testament, here is A.) the consistency of the versions in the line of Preservation:...
Many did. One defaulted to saying he sounded like a KJVO, so why was he being dishonest. Isn't that just as cute as thing to say as any? My post...
Rightly interpreting Acts 2:23 requires taking into consideration that Scripture speaks of people killing others when the person spoken of did not...
You have clearly given your opinion that the KJV, NKJV, ESV, NASB & CSB are all 'errant versions,' but when someone takes your opinion to task it...
There are some KJV-only advocates that list or include the Wycliffe Bible in their good line or pure stream of Bibles, but they seem to be...
Only Mark 6:8 does. If either Matthew 10:10 or Luke 9:3 are read staff in the singular a contradiction is made against the instruction as reported...
LOL, now the TR says in Mark 6:8, take a staff, and in Luke 9:3 do not take staffs, and in Matthew 10:10 do not take a staff. And that the WEB...
@Van We have an ongoing disagreement over Mark 6:8, Matthew 10:10 and Luke,9:3
Again, no.
No. Also the KJV does not follow TR in Matthew 10:10. The TR being singlular and the KJV plural.
The TR contradiction as presented in the KJV. Mark 6:8 take a staff (S), Luke 9:3 do not take staffs, Matthew 10:10 do not take staffs. The CT...
The CT contradiction to allow a staff, Mark 6:8 and not to allow a staff Matthew 10:10, Luke 9:3.
You fail to hear the contradiction of the CT translation.
Yes, the Modern Literal Version (MLV) and the English Majority Text Version (EMTV) both has staff in the plural at Matthew 10:10. And both have...
Am I aware that the CT may be in error and either or both the TR and MT might on occasion be correct? Yes.