Christos doulos
New Member
Usually I am not so consumed by worldly matters , but I was just saddened by this
http://www.cnn.com/video/?hpt=hp_c2#/video/bestoftv/2012/02/17/exp-point-toomey-greenstein-tax-plan.cnn
The CNN news anchor said she couldn't even say the word, because it was so offensive. "Chink in the armor" is offensive? Are you kidding me? CNN actually blurred the word out. It would almost be laughable if wasn't so scary.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/02/19/ sport/espn-lin-slur/index.html ?hpt=hp_t3
Ummmmm...Chink is not a phrase. Chink in the armor only has ONE meaning. The word chink can have a double meaning; one being a racial slur, but chink by itself is not a phrase furthermore Lin is Taiwanese and not Chinese.
The idiocy of pluralism is that it pushes towards a colorless society wanting to erase any thought of racism, and when finally succeeded in people who then use totally innocent words that can have a double meaning, they are accused of RACISM?!
The so called "wisdom" of the world constantly contradicts itself.
Perhaps the true "racists" are the ones who took a harmless phrase and perceived it as a racial slur
http://www.cnn.com/video/?hpt=hp_c2#/video/bestoftv/2012/02/17/exp-point-toomey-greenstein-tax-plan.cnn
The CNN news anchor said she couldn't even say the word, because it was so offensive. "Chink in the armor" is offensive? Are you kidding me? CNN actually blurred the word out. It would almost be laughable if wasn't so scary.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/02/19/ sport/espn-lin-slur/index.html ?hpt=hp_t3
ESPN fires writer of offensive headline about Jeremy Lin
"The headline read "Chink in the Armor," referencing the New York Knicks' 89- 85 loss Friday night to the New Orleans Hornets that ended the team's season-high winning streak.
The phrase has two meanings; one is an ethnic slur...."
Ummmmm...Chink is not a phrase. Chink in the armor only has ONE meaning. The word chink can have a double meaning; one being a racial slur, but chink by itself is not a phrase furthermore Lin is Taiwanese and not Chinese.
The idiocy of pluralism is that it pushes towards a colorless society wanting to erase any thought of racism, and when finally succeeded in people who then use totally innocent words that can have a double meaning, they are accused of RACISM?!
The so called "wisdom" of the world constantly contradicts itself.
Perhaps the true "racists" are the ones who took a harmless phrase and perceived it as a racial slur
Last edited by a moderator: