• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Dem Senators Say 1st Amendment Doesn't Protect 'Fraudulent Speech'; Bill Would Outlaw

mandym

New Member
Democratic Senators Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Ben Cardin (D-Md.) have introduced legislation that would make it a federal crime to publish false or misleading election material in an effort to prevent people from voting.

The law, the Deceptive Practices and Voter Intimidation Prevention Act of 2011, would bring federal criminal and civil penalties to anyone who intentionally puts out false information in an attempt to dissuade or prevent people from voting. The law only applies to false information published 90 days before a federal election and only to information regarding voting eligibility and the time and place of elections.

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/dem...t-protect-fraudulent-speech-bill-would-outlaw
 

Don

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
So let me get this straight: Currently, someone says something about someone else, and it gets blasted all over the media; and 24 hours later, it turns out to not be true, but by then, all anyone knows is what the original sensationalist story was, and that's the usual opinion they walk away with.

In the meantime, the individual who was slandered or libeled can file suit for slander or libel.

How does this bill act as a deterrent to such happenings, if the current libel or slander laws are obviously not deterring it?
 

Don

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Okay, upon re-reading the article...I'm still of the opinion that this is additional legislation, not legislation that we just discovered we need to have. We currently have laws that prevent voter intimidation and denial; we just don't enforce them, as with the case concerning the Black Panthers at voting booths.

This is unnecessary legislation, obviously intended to be a political remark towards republicans.
 

Aaron

Member
Site Supporter
The article isn't telling the whole story, I'm sure. The Dems are doing all they can to limit free speech. They can't win any other way.

Winston Smith worked in the Ministry of Truth.
 

Salty

20,000 Posts Club
Administrator
So Schumer wants to limit publishing info, but it would be okay for the Networks to announce it?
 
Top