BaptistBoard.com  
     

Increase font size: 0, 10, 25, 50%
Register FAQ Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Left Container Right Container
 
Go Back   BaptistBoard.com > Christian DEBATE Forums (All Christians) > Other Christian Denominations

Other Christian Denominations Debate other denominations' doctrines/beliefs here.

Fewer Ads for Registered Users - Register Now!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-25-2012, 06:55 AM
Michael Wrenn Michael Wrenn is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,319
Default Roman Catholics, Magisterial Protestants, and Other "Protestants"

I'm probably going to alienate most of the forum, but here goes:

There's a lot of "righteous indignation" shown here by some against the RCC, calling it apostate and such. The truth is, Magisterial Protestantism and many other forms of Protestantism, including "Reformed" Baptists, share much in common with the RCC, inasmuch as they are all various forms of Western, Latin Christianity which has not much in common with the earliest churches. All of these groups follow, in varying degrees, some form of Augustinianism which is a combination of part Christian and part pagan beliefs. The only branches of Christianity that have escaped that are the Eastern churches and the Anabaptists. However, since the Eastern churches have followed a non-scriptural, non-early-church hierarchical sacramentalism, the Anabaptists are the ones with the doctrines and practices closest to scripture and the early church. There is some vestige of this strain of Christianity in John Wesley, to the extent that he was influenced by Eastern Christianity.

So, the next time anyone reads an excoriation of the RCC by some "purists" who think to have escaped such a horrible expression of Christianity, remember that the one doing the excoriating is in fact a distant cousin of Rome. All of Western (Latin) Christianity has the same views of God, man, sin, and salvation. Oh, there is the battle over sacraments, faith vs. works, etc., but the soteriology springs from the same source. I have discovered a long time ago that I have virtually nothing in common with Western, Latin Christianity; it does not reflect scripture or the early church in belief, teaching, or practice.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-25-2012, 08:57 AM
Thinkingstuff's Avatar
Thinkingstuff Thinkingstuff is offline
8,000 Posts Club
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 8,169
Default

Yes those bible believing Ana-baptist were very like the early church
Quote:
In January, 1519, a church called him to Zurich. When the call came, a young woman in Einsiedeln charged him with getting her pregnant. Zwingli admitted his guilt...
Quote:
In 1532, a radical group of Anabaptists took over the town of Mǖnster, Germany by election. Their leader, one John of Leyden, convinced the town elders to allow polygamy, thereby establishing “endless links of kinship.” He led the way by taking sixteen wives. All books except the Bible were burned; and Lutherans and Catholics were murdered
Yep those great saints the Ana-baptist were the only bible followers and just like the early church. Yes the sarcasm was intentional.
__________________
“The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting; it has been found difficult and left untried.”
― G.K. Chesterton
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-25-2012, 09:18 AM
Michael Wrenn Michael Wrenn is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,319
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thinkingstuff View Post
Yes those bible believing Ana-baptist were very like the early church Yep those great saints the Ana-baptist were the only bible followers and just like the early church. Yes the sarcasm was intentional.
Let me set you straight:

Zwingli, an Anabaptist? Surely you jest. Zwingli was a Magisterial Reformer.

The Munsterites were a small, atypical group, completely unrepresentative of the Anabaptist movement. Of course you know that, but you had to say what you did to try to deflect from the fact that your RC killing machine has tried since Constantine to wipe out every Dissenter, including all the Anabaptists who were representative of the movement -- a pacifist movement seeking to follow the teachings of Jesus in His Sermon on the Mount. The RCC of the time was an instrument of Hell, persecuting and murdering in the name of Jesus, just as did the Magisterial Reformers, including Zwingli.

So, to recap with the facts: The Munsterites were in no way representative of the Anabaptist movement; they were an aberration. On the other hand, the policy of the Roman whore was to persecute and murder all Anabaptists and other dissenters, and its spawn, the Magisterial Reformers, had the same policy.

BTW, I don't equate the modern RCC with the RCC of that day. I think they are more accepting and tolerant than some fundamentalists I've known.

Last edited by Michael Wrenn; 06-25-2012 at 09:30 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-25-2012, 09:38 AM
Thinkingstuff's Avatar
Thinkingstuff Thinkingstuff is offline
8,000 Posts Club
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 8,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Wrenn View Post
Let me set you straight:

Zwingli, an Anabaptist? Surely you jest. Zwingli was a Magisterial Reformer.

The Munsterites were a small, atypical group, completely unrepresentative of the Anabaptist movement. Of course you know that, but you had to say what you did to try to deflect from the fact that your RC killing machine has tried since Constantine to wipe out every Dissenter, including all the Anabaptists who were representative of the movement -- a pacifist movement seeking to follow the teachings of Jesus in His Sermon on the Mount. The RCC of the time was an instrument of Hell, persecuting and murdering in the name of Jesus, just as did the Magisterial Reformers, including Zwingli.

So, to recap with the facts: The Munsterites were in no way representative of the Anabaptist movement; they were an aberration. On the other hand, the policy of the Roman whore was to persecute and murder all Anabaptists and other dissenters, and its spawn, the Magisterial Reformers, had the same policy.
Zwigli as well as Felix Mantz were well known Ana-baptist. And both were responsible for the Zurich movement. Certainly the Munsterites were a branch of Ana-Baptist, However, my point is clear that 1) they were no more like the early church than any other protestant reformer and 2) had the same foiables of all the people of their times.
__________________
“The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting; it has been found difficult and left untried.”
― G.K. Chesterton
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-25-2012, 10:10 AM
Michael Wrenn Michael Wrenn is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,319
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thinkingstuff View Post
Zwigli as well as Felix Mantz were well known Ana-baptist. And both were responsible for the Zurich movement. Certainly the Munsterites were a branch of Ana-Baptist, However, my point is clear that 1) they were no more like the early church than any other protestant reformer and 2) had the same foiables of all the people of their times.
Look, you'd better read up on Zwingli, as you are misinformed about him. He was a state-churchist, infant baptizer and persecutor of Anabaptists.

The Munsterites were very atypical and non-representative of Anabaptists.

The Mennonites and other Anabaptists were pacifists; they sought to follow in practice the teachings of Jesus.

The Anabaptists were completely different from the Magisterial Reformers; they were non-Augustinian in theology; they believed in religious freedom, and believer's baptism; on this basis, they were persecuted just as strongly by the Magisterial Reformers -- Luther, Calvin, and Zwingli -- as they were by the RCC.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-25-2012, 10:33 AM
Thinkingstuff's Avatar
Thinkingstuff Thinkingstuff is offline
8,000 Posts Club
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 8,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Wrenn View Post
Look, you'd better read up on Zwingli, as you are misinformed about him. He was a state-churchist, infant baptizer and persecutor of Anabaptists.

The Munsterites were very atypical and non-representative of Anabaptists.

The Mennonites and other Anabaptists were pacifists; they sought to follow in practice the teachings of Jesus.

The Anabaptists were completely different from the Magisterial Reformers; they were non-Augustinian in theology; they believed in religious freedom, and believer's baptism; on this basis, they were persecuted just as strongly by the Magisterial Reformers -- Luther, Calvin, and Zwingli -- as they were by the RCC.
Zwingli only had problems with the Ana-Baptist of Zurich after the second Zurich Disputation. However, they bought into his 67 articles and Conrad Grebel was a student of Zwingli's. But like many other protestant denominations they differed and hand internal fighting.

As far as following the teachings of Jesus they made the comon error of reading scripture in their modern context. They shaded their readings with the newly brought philosophy of the time called humanism. Much like Luther, and Calvin both shaded their reading of scripture with a legal perspective as well as humanism due to their training as lawyers. Rather than actually read scripture from the understanding of the people of the autographs time.
__________________
“The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting; it has been found difficult and left untried.”
― G.K. Chesterton
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-25-2012, 10:41 AM
Michael Wrenn Michael Wrenn is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,319
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thinkingstuff View Post
Zwingli only had problems with the Ana-Baptist of Zurich after the second Zurich Disputation. However, they bought into his 67 articles and Conrad Grebel was a student of Zwingli's. But like many other protestant denominations they differed and hand internal fighting.

As far as following the teachings of Jesus they made the comon error of reading scripture in their modern context. They shaded their readings with the newly brought philosophy of the time called humanism. Much like Luther, and Calvin both shaded their reading of scripture with a legal perspective as well as humanism due to their training as lawyers. Rather than actually read scripture from the understanding of the people of the autographs time.
The fact is, Zwingli was no Anabaptist; he did not believe in religious freedom or believer's baptism only. He was a state-church infant baptizer. He was responsible for the execution of Felix Mantz, the first Anabaptist martyr. Zwingli was a Magisterial Reformer like Luther and Calvin, not a Radical Reformer/Anabaptist.

The Anabaptists tried to follow Jesus's Sermon on the Mount literally -- thus their rejection of oaths and their pacifism.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-25-2012, 11:00 AM
Thinkingstuff's Avatar
Thinkingstuff Thinkingstuff is offline
8,000 Posts Club
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 8,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Wrenn View Post
The fact is, Zwingli was no Anabaptist; he did not believe in religious freedom or believer's baptism only. He was a state-church infant baptizer. He was responsible for the execution of Felix Mantz, the first Anabaptist martyr. Zwingli was a Magisterial Reformer like Luther and Calvin, not a Radical Reformer/Anabaptist.

The Anabaptists tried to follow Jesus's Sermon on the Mount literally -- thus their rejection of oaths and their pacifism.
Anabaptist tried to follow Jesus' Sermon on the mount Literally as they understood them. There were Anabaptist who were pacifist and Anabaptist who weren't. But most were which lead to mennonites and Amish.
__________________
“The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting; it has been found difficult and left untried.”
― G.K. Chesterton
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-25-2012, 11:09 AM
Michael Wrenn Michael Wrenn is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,319
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thinkingstuff View Post
Anabaptist tried to follow Jesus' Sermon on the mount Literally as they understood them. There were Anabaptist who were pacifist and Anabaptist who weren't. But most were which lead to mennonites and Amish.
Well, as I said, the Munsterites were a small, fanatical, atypical minority.

The reason we can worship as we choose today is because of the Anabaptists, Quakers, and Baptists -- groups despised and persecuted in their early days by both the RCC and the Magisterial Reformation.

I consider myself a spiritual descendant of the Anabaptists -- although I am not completely pacifist. My theology is mostly Anabaptist. Actually, Anabaptist views on God, man, and sin are much closer to pre-Augustinian Catholicism than to the Magisterial Reformers.

Last edited by Michael Wrenn; 06-25-2012 at 11:14 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-25-2012, 11:45 AM
Thinkingstuff's Avatar
Thinkingstuff Thinkingstuff is offline
8,000 Posts Club
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 8,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Wrenn View Post
Well, as I said, the Munsterites were a small, fanatical, atypical minority.

The reason we can worship as we choose today is because of the Anabaptists, Quakers, and Baptists -- groups despised and persecuted in their early days by both the RCC and the Magisterial Reformation.

I consider myself a spiritual descendant of the Anabaptists -- although I am not completely pacifist. My theology is mostly Anabaptist. Actually, Anabaptist views on God, man, and sin are much closer to pre-Augustinian Catholicism than to the Magisterial Reformers.
That isn't entirely true. The reason we can worship as we choose is because the founding fathers of the United States insisted on it. The founding fathers were a hodgepodge of different denominations to include some Catholics. They were tired of the wars of faith in Europe and wanted to get away from that.
__________________
“The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting; it has been found difficult and left untried.”
― G.K. Chesterton
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:08 PM.


The Fundamental Top 500   The Best Baptist Web Sites at Baptist411.com  
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Style Copyright: Wrestling Clique Wrestling Forum
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
 
 

Web Hosting for BaptistBoard.com is provided by BaptistHost.net