#5 Bible Inerrancy Poll

Thank you voter #43!

Your vote is appreciated!

 

Thank you voter #44!

Your vote is appreciated!

 

Thank you voter #45!

Your vote is appreciated!

 

Thank you voter #46!

Your vote is appreciated!

 

Here are the results with 46 votes in
(for this poll only, see the OP = opening
post, for the results of previous polls.

Poll Results: #5 Bible Inerrancy Poll (46 votes.)
#5 Bible Inerrancy Poll
Choose 1
-1. The Bible has errors (i.e. is NOT inerrant) 7% (3)
0. The Bible has minor errors but is still useful 2% (1)
1. The Bible is inerrant on all doctrinal issues 7% (3)
2. inerrant on all issues like historic/scientific 0% (0)
3. The Bible is inerrant in the original autographs 70% (32)
4. inerrant only in the KJV1611 Authorized Version 11% (5)
5. inerrant in any English translation based on the TR 0% (0)
6. inerrant in all faithful English translations 4% (2)
7. inerrant as applied by _____ (post person or group) 0% (0)

 

Thank you voter #47!

Your vote is appreciated!

 

Thank you voter #48!

Your vote is appreciated!

 

Poll Results: #5 Bible Inerrancy Poll (51 votes.)
#5 Bible Inerrancy Poll
Choose 1
First column, change from 46 to 51;
Last columns, value at 51 votes

=== - -1. The Bible has errors (i.e. is NOT inerrant) 6% (3)
=== - 0. The Bible has minor errors but is still useful 2% (1)
+02 - 1. The Bible is inerrant on all doctrinal issues 10% (5)
+01 - 2. inerrant on all issues like historic/scientific 2% (1)
+02 - 3. The Bible is inerrant in the original autographs67% (34)
=== - 4. inerrant only in the KJV1611 Authorized Version 10% (5)
=== - 5. inerrant in any translation based on the TR 0% (0)
=== - 6. inerrant in all faithful English translations 4% (2)
=== - 7. inerrant as applied by _____ (post group) 0% (0)

 

Thank you voter #49!

Your vote is appreciated!

 

Thank you voter #50!

Your vote is appreciated!

 

Thank you voter #51!

Your vote is appreciated!

 

Thank you voter #52!

Your vote is appreciated!

 

Thank you voter #53!

Your vote is appreciated!

 

Thank you voter #54!

Your vote is appreciated!

 

Thank you voter #54!

Your vote is appreciated!

 

Thank you voter #54!

Again, your vote is appreciated!

 

Poll Results: #5 Bible Inerrancy Poll (55 votes.)
#5 Bible Inerrancy Poll
(column 1 is the last 4 votes #51-#55):

+1 - -1. The Bible has errors (i.e. is NOT inerrant) 7% (4)
== - 0. The Bible has minor errors but is still useful 2% (1)
+2 - 1. The Bible is inerrant on all doctrinal issues 13% (7)
== - 2. inerrant on all issues like historic/scientific 2% (1)
== - 3. The Bible is inerrant in the original autographs 62% (34)
+1 - 4. inerrant only in the KJV1611 Authorized Version 11% (6)
== - 5. inerrant in any English translation based on the TR 0% (0)
== - 6. inerrant in all faithful English translations 4% (2)
== - 7. inerrant as applied by _____ (post person or group) 0% (0)

 

I spend an hour a day (or more) composing
responses for this Forum.

Here is one for a topic now closed ....


Rev. Lowery: //Why would
this brother even make a statement like this?//

He was making a parable to illustrate a point.
It was a 3rd rate parable. Is that a crime?


Rev. Lowery: //Its because MVO'ist say everything is the truth
how are they to know what the truth is.//

Actually I don't consider that a correct statemtne to say
about the MVO'ist. Also, MVO'ist is a poor term.
The term 'MVO'ist' is full of self contradiction.
It appears 'made up' by people who don't even begin to
understand what anti-KJVO-ism/pro-KJVs is all about.

Here is the assumption I make which causes me to use
MVs (including the KJV1769 /used by most KJV users/ edition):

All printed English Bibles are individually the Written Word
of God, the Holy Bible, and collectively the Written Word
of God, the Holy Bible.

Spiritual insite is freqently given when we compare one
translation with another.

There are no contradictions within one Engish Bible;
there are no contradictions among various English Bibles
-- this is a staement about God, not men. Men need to
prayerfully and intently study their Bibles to show themselves
approved by God.

Rev. Lowery: // All MV's contradict each other at some place
where as all KJV's never contradicts themself.//

IF you make my logical
assumption above, you would see that MVs cannot contradicti
each other. There are some apparent contradictions between
different KJVs. As per my logical assumption, then need to
be discussed among students of God's Holy Written Word.

This version/translation Forum
could really be a good place for the serious student of
the Holy Bibles, God's Written Word for Mankind.
But alas, there is a group of people who will not
accept our basic assumptions bolded above.

Instead they make the logical assumption bolded below:

The KJV (AKA: KJB) is the ONLY inerrant Written Word
of God. There is only one way to interpert each
phrase, my way.

Needless to say, this frequently runs into many logical errors.
showing the error of the assumption. The chief among these
is the 'superiority smurk' - like this faulty assumption
gives the user some special status before God.
The only special status is before King James and the Anglican
Church.

Because of the long history of use by English speaking peoples,
there are many understandings of the KJV that cause brethren
to be split apart. I've been documenting them.
The one for this topic would be:

there is no scripture allowed to be privately interperted.

This means that no Bible prophecy was given to a private
individual (and thus all Bible prophecy is for all people).

This does NOT mean that the Soul Independent Baptist
who is a Priest and Child of the King is incapable of
figuring out the scripture for themselves.

Somebody: //I say some of the
MV's show to be Spiritual Mongoloids when they
try to use foot notes and comments made by the translators
or man himself when it comes to Gods Word!//

I say that that the KJV1611 Edition (not the same thing
that is used here called the AV161 - that still
remains unknown, undescribed, and unobtainable) that
I have has the 'foot notes' which are by 'men'.
They are the translator footnotes which help us understand
GOD'S TRUTH - the Written Word, God's Holy Bible.
thevery existance of the translator margin notes
shows that the men who translated the
KJV1611 version had not one but multiple witnesses.
The KJV1611 edition was translated by people who were doing
'Critical analysis' (deciding which variant source was the
best source). Though this is called by
some the TR (textus receptus) - there is not just one TR but several TRs.

There are other notes made in the margins of Bibles which are not
as useful. These include:

1. reference to other similar passages
2. Bible Comentary (such as Schofield's notes)

These are similiar to pop-ups and ads imbedded in web pages

Said on another Forum:
//The Bible was written
in the Original Tongues before God inspired the KJB.
I have an inspired Bible. I have an infallible Bible.
I have an inerrant Bible, one w/o contradiction or error.
I have researched all the claims by the "other" camp
and find none of them able to remain ... //

I can clearly say this of my HCSB = Christian Standard
Bible /Holman, 2003/.

//The Bible was written
in the Original Tongues before God inspired the HCSB.
I have an inspired HCS Bible. I have an infallible HCS Bible.
I have an inerrant HCS Bible, one w/o contradiction or error.
I have researched all the claims by the "other" camp
and find none of them able to remain ... //

 

Thank you voter #55!

Again, your vote is appreciated!