A simple Example of Evolutionism's fiction

Discussion in '2004 Archive' started by BobRyan, Nov 25, 2004.

  1. BobRyan

    BobRyan
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    30,837
    Likes Received:
    4
    By way of context. It is fully expected that the junk-science methods and bias of evolutionists will result in imaginative “Stories” and lots of arm waiving – but little by way of actual “fact”. That is why each time they claim to find “actual sequences” in the fossil record that SHOW smooth stepwise evolution – they have cause to highlight these as “Shining examples” of their fairytales having substance in “real life” in real empirical science!

    Bible believing – Genesis-believing Christians are always amazed when an evolutionist claims to have found such a compelling sequence IN the fossil record. But as this small sample shows – the “truth is” that evolutionist speculation only survives in a factless void. Once a reasonable amount of data is available on the subject – they must confess their fraudulent practices.

    The Horse series is no exception to the rule.

    The WILD, Classic, Traditional (Darwinian) claim for Horse evolution:
    Sound familiar? It should -- How “LIKE” their efforts with Archaeopteryx and Bird evolution!!

    But are those discredited positions of evolutionism – still part of the faith and practice of some devotees of evolutionism today??

    http://www.baptistboard.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php/topic/28/2900/4.html#000051

    </font>[/QUOTE]No basis for such wild evolutionist SEQUENCES:

    [/quote]

    In time, fact replace evolutionism’s fiction:

    From these quotes we discover that EVEN among evolutionism’s faithful the certainty of grandiose claims for change – becomes LESS true over time as Real science confronts junk-science speculation with “details” replacing guesswork with some “fact”.
    The above statement is a classic confession that data is never the friend of evolutionists – it merely unravels the twisted layers of guesswork and speculation built around skimpy data, wild guesses and evolutionist religious fervor.

    Gould sees the same thing in the discrediting of the horse series sequence published by Simpson.

    Result: Atheist Evolutionists disparage the horse series fraud

    Additional points to keep in mind:
    a) There is no site in the world where the evolutionary succession of the horse can be seen. Rather, the fossil fragments have been gathered from several continents on the assumption of evolutionary progress.

    b) Bones of the supposed earliest horses have been found at or near the surface. Sometimes they are found right next to modern horse fossils.

    In Christ,

    Bob
     
  2. BobRyan

    BobRyan
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    30,837
    Likes Received:
    4
    Summary “problem” for this fraudulent Horse series presentation by Simpson and others.

    Here is the really sad part for objective clear thinkers.

    The erroneous data was foisted onto the public "as through true" from the priestly temples of evolutionism – they did NOT simply argue from some artist's drawings that "HERE is how we THINK fossils will be found some day showing how the horse evolved". (As UTEOTW seems to HOPE they were saying).

    Rather they get real fossils with real feet and “show them lined up” as if found that way - and then they “claim” this is the fossil evidence “showing” horse evolution as it exists IN the fossil record, real animals, real feet, real bones, real sequences. (You can’t get rid of the feet without getting rid the animal and confessing that the sequence was not actually FOUND that way in the fossil record)

    Yet they present those animal fossils AS IF it is a factual find – a sequence observed IN the fossil record. Fact – not simply speculation propping up the myths of evolutionism.

    Yet even Simpson admits that presenting such sequences as fact is intellectually dishonest.

    </font>[/QUOTE]
    Now see UTEOTW use weasel words and misdirection to try and doge the obvious problem.

    Simpson was presenting fossil sequence as FACT - as related - as ancestors WITH FEET.

    There is no change to declare that as FALSE without taking the ANIMALS that the feet come with - with you.

    And then what is the horrible implication about the "faith" of the devotees that initially presented the fraudulent sequence and those that today still try to defend it??

    In Christ,

    Bob
     
  3. BobRyan

    BobRyan
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    30,837
    Likes Received:
    4
    Efforts to recover credibility among Evolutionists

    Gould argues for a jumbled fossil assortment in the geologic column instead of sequences.
    Gould argues that real data – allows some of the junk-science speculations (such as the discredited horse series) to be thrown out the window. (Discarded – as Raup notes)
    Since some would argue for taking larger chunks of Simpson’s position and dissecting them – here is one.

    #1. We have to agree that it IS a classic example of evolutionism promoting its beliefs.
    #2. The uniform transition sequence of animal to animal, species to species, fossil to fossil – never happened as it was presented. It was a contrived sequence using REAL fossils and simply MAKING stuff up as it pleased the priests of evolutionism at the time.

    By contrast – we would have “expected” them to present QUESSWORK as a series of artists drawings and pictures of unknown – mythical models that they HOPED would be found in the fossil record one day. INSTEAD they present actual finds of actual fossils and show an actual sequence. Then later admit that they are simply overstating the case and can not actually prove any of what they have said as a real SEQUENCE in the fossil record.


    </font>[/QUOTE]Hopefully these EXACT quotes will be helpful to those who actually have an interest in the facts of the case.

    In Christ,

    Bob
     

Share This Page

Loading...