Len Smith, a KJV-only author, wrote: "The Textus Receptus is a corrupt family of rotten Bible remnants because of the errors it contains" (THE AGE OF REASON: THE MODERN BABYLONIAN CAPTIVITY, chapter D22, p. 3). [theswordbearer.org] Len Smith wrote: "But the real reason we know that the Authorized King James Version did not come from the Textus Receptus is because the King James does not agree with any manuscript in the Textus Receptus. In fact, the KJV has readings in it that do not appear in any manuscript in any family on earth" (D22, p. 3). Len Smith wrote: "The King James is not a faithful, accurate, scholarly translation of the Textus Receptus or any manuscript on earth" (D22, p. 7). Len Smith wrote: "And, like the original book of Malachi, the King James is an original autograph because it is not a translation (as men of corrupt minds, and destitute of the truth, suppose) because it doesn't agree with any ERROR manuscript in any family. It is a unique original" (D22, p. 21).