1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

An honest and accurate essay on Lincoln

Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by billwald, Nov 12, 2009.

  1. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Nothing you said is correct or supported by the constitution. Just as an example the fed cannot enter a state for even benevolent reasons unless invited by the state first. The main problem after Katrina was the the Louisiana Governor waited way to long to invite any federal assistance in.
     
    #21 Revmitchell, Nov 13, 2009
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 13, 2009
  2. Aaron

    Aaron Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    20,253
    Likes Received:
    1,381
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Have you read it? I didn't make this stuff up.
     
  3. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist
    yea and apparently you do not understand the concept of enumerated powers.
     
  4. Aaron

    Aaron Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    20,253
    Likes Received:
    1,381
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Sure I do. The power to grant or deny statehood rests solely with congress.
     
  5. Alcott

    Alcott Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2002
    Messages:
    9,405
    Likes Received:
    353
    Faith:
    Baptist
    As I assume you are referring to White v. Texas (1869) in particular, or as one such case, that was just wrongly decided constitutionally by Amendment X. The obvious reason was: in the recent war between the seceded states and the present "reconstruction" thereof, is the highest court in the land now going to say the Union had no legal authority to resist secession, and thus operated under nothing but imperialism? [Northern] Americans were too dead set that they preserved the Union, rather than they conquered a foreign sovereignty, as with Mexico 2 decades earlier.
     
  6. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Which has nothing to do with succession
     
  7. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist
    In the end if a state wants to secede it will and nothing can be done about it. It has already been done by 11 states in the past and they later chose to rejoin the Union.
     
  8. RAdam

    RAdam New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2009
    Messages:
    2,100
    Likes Received:
    0
    Some states have written into their state constitutions that they can't secede. Mississippi is one of them.
     
  9. Aaron

    Aaron Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    20,253
    Likes Received:
    1,381
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It has everything to do with secession. If only congress can grant statehood, then only congress can revoke it.
     
Loading...