Apparently a Federal Judge Cares about Hilary's emails

Discussion in 'News / Current Events' started by Revmitchell, Jun 4, 2016.

  1. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,287
    Likes Received:
    780
    (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today announced that a court order was issued by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan requiring Bryan Pagliano, the Clinton State Department IT official who reportedly provided support for the Clinton email system, to produce to the court his reported immunity agreement and the legal basis for the Fifth Amendment claims he planned to assert in Judicial Watch’s discovery into the Clinton email system. The order delays Mr. Pagliano’s deposition, which had been scheduled for Monday, June 6.

    Judge Sullivan’s order, issued at 5:22 pm, “minute order” states:

    The deposition of non-party Bryan Pagliano is hereby postponed until further order of the Court. Counsel for Mr. Pagliano shall file a Memorandum of Law addressing the legal authority upon which Mr. Pagliano relies to assert his Fifth Amendment rights in this civil proceeding, including requisite details pertaining to the scope of Mr. Pagliano’s reported immunity agreement with the Government. Mr. Pagliano’s Memorandum of Law, along with a copy of his reported immunity agreement, shall be filed no later than Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 5:00 p.m. The parties are ordered to file responsive memoranda of law no later than Friday, June 10, 2016 at 12:00 p.m. Mr. Pagliano shall file a reply memorandum no later than Monday, June 13, 2016 at 5:00 p.m. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on June 3, 2016.

    “The court’s order is an important step to getting more answers from Mr. Pagliano about Hillary Clinton’s email system,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

    http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-...agreement-legal-basis-fifth-amendment-claims/
     
  2. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,894
    Likes Received:
    294
    Kinda strange to take the 5th when you have "immunity". The judge is no dummy.

    Sounds like Pagliano may be more afraid of Hillary than he is the court.
     
  3. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,287
    Likes Received:
    780
    Or he is just in agreement with the agenda
     
  4. Zaac

    Zaac
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2012
    Messages:
    13,757
    Likes Received:
    220
    It's quite common to take the 5th when you have immunity especially when overzealous prosecutors keep attempting to skirt the law to see if something sticks.

    And there must be a reading problem. This story expresses NOTHING of the judge caring about some stupid emails. As a federal judge, he's got sense enough to only express questions as issues of the LAW.

    He has asked about Pagliano's immunity deal. As the judge giving the conspiracy theorists extraordinaire a little wiggle room, he needs to know what the immunity deal includes so that he can decide on procedure in any attempts to depose Pagliano.
     

Share This Page

Loading...