Babies destroyed for science

As horrible as it is to think about..... science is so overly esteemed that, without conscience or restraint, there probably is already sufficient knowledge to just harvest the generative organs of organ donors and culture in a lab to produce the ova and germative seed to produce fertilized eggs and grow stem cell at will.

I don't think there was any mistake that the tree in the garden which fruit was to be avoided....... was the tree of knowledge, of good and evil. Not all knowledge is good. Not all desire for knowledge springs from good intentions. By the time sordid purposes are discovered, it is often too late to turn back from the evil produced. An example is the Atomic Bomb. We now have nuclear energy.... and it is the cheapest (or one of the cheapest) forms of electricity production, but there are more nuclear weapons in existance than plants to produce cheap electricity.

 

JC
Don't let your fingers get ahead of your brain. What gave you the idea I supported test tube babies? I support adoption not abortion as you do.

Now you answer the question others have asked: Do you support test tube babies?

 

Need to add...

If eight are implanted and four survive usually two or three are aborted.

Everybody is upset about the octamom with her kids but she just decided to have all of the survivors rather than aborting most of them.

 

Now we've hit page 5, with no answer. Guess he doesn't have one. Which is an implied admission that he was wrong.

 

Somone who voted for obamanation admits they were wrong? I dont see it happening. As we have seen they will get banned first!

:tongue3:

 

Why isn't that obvious from my posts? Yes I oppose in vietro fertilization. However, if there are frozen embryos that have been produced by this ungodly process, I support using them to aid in finding new cures for diseases rather than being discarded (murdered).

 

Either way, they are murdered. :tear:

 

These embryos are already condemned to death. They will be put in a frozen state for a period of time and then discarded that is murdered. It's better for them to give their live to create cures for diseases than to die in vain.

 

True but who are the culprits? The murderers are the couples who engage in In Vietro Fertilization.

 

6 pages, and several responses to others. Man, am I being ignored, or what?

 

You may be a little too concerned with this person.

 

I've never said I supported abortion. You're just making these things up.

 

Don asked a very good question!

 

A vote for Obama is a vote for abortion. An appeal for the success of the Obama administration is an appeal for the success of his abortion program, which he passionately supports, else why so much action to further this crime when he should be concentrating on the real problems facing this nation. (And it doesn't matter who caused the problem, they are now his to solve.)

 

Two wrongs don't make a right. Dicarding them is wrong. Using them for scientific research is wrong. Both are murder no matter which route you take and cannot be justified. What did we in the United States expect when we elected an abortionist?

 

My belief is that this isn't true. If a couple decides to murder embryos by getting involved in In Vietro Fertilization that has already been done. These embryos are going to be "discarded." Why not use them for life saving research instead of the trash can?

 

Because what ever happened we should not participate in this destruction of life.