Bain: Still ‘No Evidence’

mandym · Jul 27, 2012

The Obama campaign says a new Associated Press story backs up its claims that Mitt Romney “did not leave [Bain Capital] when he says he did,” and that he’s responsible for “American jobs that were outsourced” by Bain-controlled companies after February 1999. We don’t think so.

Some impressive reporting by the AP and others recently has shown that Romney retained ownership and corporate titles at Bain for a time after he took a hurried leave of absence on Feb. 11, 1999, to manage the 2002 Winter Olympics. That has been shown by any number of routine corporate disclosures with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and Romney even signed some of them.

But we’ve seen no evidence so far to show that Romney was actually running Bain, even part-time and from a distance of nearly 2,100 miles, as the Obama campaign wishes voters to believe. And we’ve seen no evidence to contradict what Romney has certified repeatedly to be true (under pain of federal prosecution): that he “has not had any active role” with Bain or “been involved in the operations” since that time.
Click to expand...

http://factcheck.org/2012/07/bain-still-no-evidence/

OldRegular · Jul 28, 2012

All this goes to show that Chicago bred politicians are liars! Illinois is a corrupt state and Chicago is the root cause!

Bain: Still ‘No Evidence’

mandym New Member

OldRegular Well-Known Member

Useful Searches

Bain: Still ‘No Evidence’

mandym New Member

OldRegular Well-Known Member