Breaking news...

Liberals are scared to death of her and it is sending their visceral hatred through the ceiling.

 

Thank you, Pastor Mitchell. I appreciate it. :wavey:

 

So all of this vitriol directed toward President Obama by conservatives must mean, according to your reasoning, that conservatives are scared to to death that he has what it takes to be a very, very successful president.

 

Actually it means we are concerned that he will further dismantle the constitution and the economy. Bush did enough of that in his second term with corporate take overs and entitlement programs. His marxist policies should be a concern for all of us. And by the way everyone can see the original post. Hacking up a quote from me and trying to rearrange the context is silly.

 

Then, according to your own reasoning, those of us opposed to Sarah Palin are concerned that she will dismantle the Bill of Rights and impose beggar thy neighbor, race to the bottom economic policies.

And, by the way, looking at your avatar, our Founding Fathers were mostly libertarians, not right-wingers.

 

Factually incorrect.

Yes, I am objective about your posting.

So not only are you posting when you said you wouldn't. Now you are telling others when they can post. You really have some chutzpah, Ken.

No I didn't. If you knew what a personal attack was, you would know very well that I didn't make a personal attack against you. I made a statement reasonably grounded in experience that had nothing to do with you as a person. It, by definition, was not a personal attack.

Seriously, Ken, why do you break your word so easily? Just answer that.

 

Think before you post.

 

Physician, heal thyself.

 

1) No, factually correct.

2) That's the best laugh I've had so far today, Pastor Larry. Thanks. :laugh:

3) Yes, you did. Just buck up and admit it.

 

Have you ever read Marx?

Go to: http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/61

 

Probably Groucho Marx!

 

This shows that you are not objective about your own posting.

Your welcome. Life is easier when you accept the truth. I am not entirely objective about my own posts, but I am generally about others. In this case, were you to ask if I were objective about my own posts, I would say, "No." But the question was about objectivity about your posts. You are not objective about them. You have too much invested in them,

No I didn't. I have demonstrated that several different ways. And the fact that you still don't get it proves my point. You won't win by defending yourself.

But I noticed you didn't answer the question: Why do you break your word so easily? Doesn't that bother you?

 

1) I am not the issue. I am not a public figure. I have no influence on public policy to speak of.

2) Yes, you did.

 

I can't wait until she declares wolf hunting season!!!

hehehehe...

 

I believe she was going to declare open season on lemmings.

 

Indeed, somebody who continues to post about politics after stating, on multiple occasions, that they weren't going to post about politics anymore is certainly the model of consistency.

Maybe you really do, but it's funny how I don't see you criticizing Democrats when they do the same things that Republicans do.

And just where is the smiley that lets me know you were joking? :wavey:

 

LOL...:tongue3:

But you mean Obama lemmings, right!!! :tonofbricks:

 

[/FONT]

No, just the good old fashion ones that if they do not get shot will run into the ocean and ......... well you know.

 

Fortunately, she won't be in a position of power to do that.

 

Conservatives take care of them. I see no reason to duplicate efforts. :wavey: