Most Biblical Scholars today reject the Byzantine superiority theory; looking instead towards other text types as being older and more accurate. Let us discuss some of the actual facts regarding the manuscripts and see why some say "Byzantine" and others feel more comfortable with other manuscripts, which may include the Alexandrian. Also, are they both preserved well enough to be considered the Word-of-God? Are doctrinal changes enough to question the claim as the Word-of-God by either any of the major text types? What say you? (Can we stick to facts and not feelings here? At least as much as possible ---- Please.) I do understand that certain theories will have to be presented here, but let us try to stay away from theories based solely on emotional grounds. Thanks.