Challenge: Prove there are Errors in a King James Bible

That is Hosea. Not the same as the name Osee (in English). Remember the KJV is English, and the Greek is no longer good. The KJVonly idea is that no other translating needs to be done now that we have the KJV. In English of the KJV there is a Hosea and there is no Osee. In order to pick Hosea you must translate it in your mind that Hosea means Osee. This is not allowed in KJVonly camp. The translation is done and sealed forever. Throw away the greek...we have the KJV.

:BangHead: :BangHead:

It was hard to type this without laughing.

 

Again, you are breaking the Challenger's rule. If you want to compare Samuel and Chronicles in regard to who killed Goliath, that would be very legitinmate, but you are using a non-KJB Bible. -- herb Evans

 

You did not issue the challenge, and you have not proved that the challenge is valid. Just because someone issues a challenge does not make it valid. It does not matter how specific the challenge was if the challenge is invalid. You seem to assume that you make the rules at this forum and the rules for this thread.

The point of this thread seems to be an attempt to limit the Bible translation issue to a challenge based on inconsistent, invalid, and unproven KJV-only assumptions and premises. A challenge based on invalid premises would be invalid.

 

Just playing by the rules.

:wavey: :wavey: :wavey:


Maybe you would like to post Osee. Come now...its getting late.

 

I agree, but you broke the rule too. Still, his spelling error or difference is against the rule to begin with. -- Herb Evans

 

So what is the English word for Isaiah? :laugh:

At yourself I presume...

 

Yes, I realized that. But the same argument can be made without breaking the rules. It was a minor infraction to say the least.

 

By comparing the quotes in the same KJB? -- Herb Evans

 

Playing by the rules of the KJVO....Isaiah is now Gods choosen word for the English. So yes...Isaiah is the name in a English Bible.

Any word on Osee??

 

But you did not show any error, all you did is claim one and ask a question. It is not an error, so the burden of proof is on you to prove your allegation. -- Herb Evans

 

Yes, sir, by doing just that.

 

Okay, I will have mercy on whom i will have mercy. You are forgiven. -- Herb Evans

 

Not so..
Lets repost the OP and look.

Notive the dash between each point. The spelling errors, typos, etc...are limited to 1611. Every thing else goes.

Come now...Osee please.

 

Matthew 3:3 For this is he that was spoken of by the prophet Esaias, saying, The voice of one crying in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make his paths straight.

Oh no!!! Who is Esaias? Jarthur has shaken my faith. :tongue3:

 

Well, you have broken the rule again. But I guess you think that all differences are errors, so I can't help you there. -- Herb Evans

 

Good point...

Who is Esaias??

Got to go....be back tonight looking for some answers.


Later guys...its been fun.

 

Silly guy, Esaias is Isaiah. (Who doesn't know that?) :laugh:

 

Can these renderings from a KJV be shown to be correct or incorrect according to the challenge?


Matt. 14:9 oaths' sake (a current KJV)
Matt. 23:24 strain out (a current KJV)
Mark 6:26 oaths' sake (a current KJV)
Luke 1:63 writing-tablet (a current KJV)
John 10:25 ye believe (a current KJV)
John 19:18 others (a current KJV)
Acts 7:45 Joshua (a current KJV)
Acts 25:23 were entered (a current KJV)
2 Cor. 1:21 establisheth (a current KJV)
2 Cor. 3:3 tablets (a current KJV)
Heb. 13:9 diverse (a current KJV)
1 Tim. 2:9 shamefastness (a current KJV)
Heb. 10:23 hope (a current KJV)
Jude 11 Korah (a current KJV)

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Herb Evans
That means that there are a lot of rule breakers on here that want to either change the subject or silence the Challenger's challenge. It also means that there are folks on here trying to foil that attempt. Thread like these produce many ear stoppers. Don't worry, the thread will be killed before too much is made obvious about Bible error finding. -- Herb Evans

That socalled personal attack had a question mark after it. The second socalled attack was not an attack on the moderatorating team, that was a prediction made throgh my experience on BOARD KJB threads in the past that have been micromanaged beyond reason because of disagreements against the things posted. And also comments made on this thread like "red herring" shows me the way that the thread is going. -- Herb Evans

 

Though poor debating skills, red herrings do not violate the rules and it will run until it goes off topic or personal attacks step up.