Constitution Party logo on the board

Touchy, touchy. Republicans get real mad when some conservatives show up. "Don't upset the apple cart while OUR party is slopping at the trough."

 

The Republican Party probably has enough power to ban the CP from the Presidential debates.

Hopefully though they don't have enough to ban it from the Baptist Board.

 

The owner of this Web site choose to put a banner for the movie "The Passion" on the site, that doesn't mean he has to advertise every other movie that is playing.

 

Well, I for one saw the ad, and didn't have a problem with it. However, if I saw an ad for the Democratic or Republican parties, they wouldn't bug me, either. I don't have a problem with the site administrator(s) selling ad space. If memory serves, the ad links are provided by an outside agency that pays for the ad space, not the ad holders themselves (I could be wrong, thoogh), so the admin(s) don't have as much say about what ads appear as one would think.

 

http://www.baptistboard.com/advertising.html

 

Unless televised debates are paid for by the public, I personally don't thin kit should be open to every Tom, Dick, and Harry party that comes along. It makes for a cure for insomnia. If supporters of the CP are serious, then let them buy the air time and have their own debate.

Besides, the debates are anything but. They're little more than Q & A with rebuttal. Perhaps we should have the WWF organize the debates. At least it will be more real.

 

WASHINGTON -- Several former third-party presidential candidates filed a lawsuit yesterday [2/11/2004] to block the Commission on Presidential Debates from sponsoring future debates, asserting the organization is biased toward the Democratic and Republican parties.

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2004/02/12/third_party_hopefuls_sue_for_inclusion/

 

They were able to have televised debates with 9 Democratic candidates. They should be able to set up a few more mics for some of the third-party candidates in the September debates.

 

I think that they should allow any party in the presidential and vice-presidential debates that has earned ballot access in enough States to win an Electoral College majority. Or, at a minimum, any party that is on the ballot in all 50 States and the District of Columbia.

 

The Constitution Party is preferable to me compared to the Democratic and Republican Parties(aka We Want Bigger and More Intrusive Government Parties).

 

The Constitution Party is preferable to me compared to the Democratic and Republican Parties(aka We Want Bigger and More Intrusive Government Parties). </font>[/QUOTE]Hey, wait!!! Wouldn't that make it a preference for "the lesser of evils"? Something dems and reps cite, but get finger-pointed for? Just joshing!!!

Johnv
(ducking to avoid the tomatoes!!)

 

Johnv,



Nope. Since I don't consider any political party that wants to reduce the size of the federal government to constitutional size to be evil.

 

Who cares about any of this. It's his board, he can do whatever he wants.

Joseph Botwinick