Featured Constitutional Crap is So Lame Pt. 2

Then how is being required to register at all and then also show ID not an infringement as well.

Not even a close comparison.

How do they do it in your state? In Minnesota we have to state our name and address and sign on the voter registration rolls.

What does moving or being a student have to do with having an id at the time of registering but not at the polls.

 

Please show us in the constitution where voting is a constitutional right.

 

The idea that some do not have ID's and that they cannot get one is just a liberal lie.

The motive behind not having an ID is to allow illegals to vote.

Obama has opened the borders and now illegals are coming in almost completely unfettered. And if you do not have to prove who you are anyone can vote. This is all about Democrats winning elections. And those who fail to see this are only being foolish.

 

Here are few that were convicted.

http://mediatrackers.org/ohio/2013/...d-of-illegal-voting-sought-to-test-the-system

http://mediatrackers.org/ohio/2013/...-issued-for-illegal-voting-in-hamilton-county

http://video.foxnews.com/v/2427060680001/ohio-voter-fraud-conviction/

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/voter-fraud-real-rare/story?id=17213376

http://www.rnla.org/votefraud.asp

 

Its not really in there. Voting rights have been restricted many ways over the years and the constitution leaves that up to individual states. Discrimination based on race, gender, or wealth have been lawful in the past.

The law you want to look at is the 1965 voting rights act. That law prohibits establishing any "qualification or prerequisite" to voting.

 

So how is showing proof of residency not an infringement but a legitimate id is? Why is it also not a matter of guilt or innocence with you to have to do so?

 

Check the abc link I posted, voter ID would have stopped that one.

Voter fraud happens, it happens a lot and no one wants to expose it because the cheaters are usually the winners. It happens on both sides of the political spectrum in all parties.

If you want to oppose voter ID on the grounds it discriminates I can buy that, but answer me this: Would you be in favor of stiffening the penalties when voter cheats are caught. I am talking decades in prison and loss of voter privileges for life. If the penalty were higher perhaps fewer people would take the risk. Messing with free elections should be a serious crime.

 

Your position is inconsistent and illogical.

 

Isn't voting a right ONLY for citizens, non felons at that? How does one know this without the proper id?

 

Have you been hanging out with Yeshua? :laugh:

 

Its clear fraud takes place, and quite openly. All over the US there were districts where Romney received 0 votes, some 1, 2, etc. compared to thousands and tens of thousands for Obama.

 

And that's adequate exactly how?? Big deal. You don't think someone intent on helping to steal an election will have any compunctions about lying by signing a false signature? Surely you're not that naive?

 

That's quite good but you left a few facts out.

What actually happened on 9/15/01 was congress under extreme duress (fear of an outside threat either real or promulgated) abdicated it's own authority and oversight responsibility and gave Bush a blank check to wage a global "war on terrorism"

I bet Obama thanks Bush and Cheney every single day for making that separation of powers a thing of the past.

Letter of marque for OBL his merry band of cave dwellers and limited action in Afghanistan okay. I might go along with that. But not for ten years or more.Iraq however had nothing to do with 9/11 even though the Bush boys did their best to convince us it did. They tried to convince us Saddam was tied to 9/11 while trying to convince us they weren't trying to convince us Saddam had anything to do with 9/11. And all those sloppy fake news reports and the pentagon's "message force multipliers". Who can forget that? So called independent military analysts paid by military contractors giving out "good war news" on Fox News every night.

Whew those were some confusing days I'll tell ya what! I don't know who had it harder keeping track of all the lies me or the Bush administration.

Then the real constitution shredding started. I do a point by point later maybe when I have more time.

Right did it on false pretenses same as Bush and against international law as well. See how well the internationalists obey their own rules?

Well why not look at the precedents Bush and Clinton set. Ignore the constitution and international law?

So what? Americans are either to busy being frightened of the terrorists Washington trains, funds and arms or to busy worrying about protecting the good name of their political favorites who lie to their faces and laugh behind their backs.to worry about the constitution and civil liberties.

That's proven day in and day out right here on these electronic pages.

Just from a quick count in my head I'd say it's more like this.

International bankers and corporations 95

Average American 0

Next? Well that all depends on you doesn't it" You got three choices.

A tyrannical right wing NWO or a tyrannical left wing NWO or a constitutional republic ruled by law not men.

Bet I know which one you choose.

 

Isn't Minnesota the State where Al Franken just fraudulently stole an election right in front of the entire nation? Wish there were some rules to have prevented fraud there

 

Thanks, I was about to post this and came across your clear and succinct post so there is no need to follow up :thumbsup: