David Barton - The Poll

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Salty, Oct 7, 2010.

?

The Grade I give David Barton is

  1. An "A" He is excellent source of information

    1 vote(s)
    7.7%
  2. A "B" He is a good source of information

    1 vote(s)
    7.7%
  3. A "C" He is a fair source of information

    2 vote(s)
    15.4%
  4. A "D" He is a poor source of information

    2 vote(s)
    15.4%
  5. A "F" He is a horrible source of information

    7 vote(s)
    53.8%
  1. Salty

    Salty
    Expand Collapse
    20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,130
    Likes Received:
    221
  2. Bob Alkire

    Bob Alkire
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2001
    Messages:
    3,134
    Likes Received:
    0
    He is middle of the road, he paints much from his point of view as so many of our history writers seem to do. Take a point of time in history and get twenty or so history books and you will get anywhere from five to twenty or so different views of that time frame. Take lets say WW ll,and look up twenty or so newspapers on pre war or something in the war and read the difference from many of the papers. I had a history professor who said most history is taking someone else opinion on what happen and he was there either.
     
  3. Salty

    Salty
    Expand Collapse
    20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,130
    Likes Received:
    221
    Time to cast your vote, if you haven't
     
  4. JohnDeereFan

    JohnDeereFan
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2009
    Messages:
    4,628
    Likes Received:
    11
    Salty, just to give you a little background about where I'm coming from, I have two grad degrees in history and taught history at both the high school and college levels for several years. I love history and take it very seriously.

    Most of what Barton says is accurate, in the strict sense. But the problem is that he tends to pick and choose. He goes looks at history like MSNBC practices journalism: he states his ideology and then sets out to prove it.

    It's not his facts I disagree with, but his scholarship and methodology.

    I guess you could say that he is to historical scholarship what Thomas Kincade is to art.

    I like the guy and I even have a couple of his books. As a commentator on the Christian role in the founding and shaping of America, I think he's great. As an historian, I give him a C.
     
  5. billwald

    billwald
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Likes Received:
    0
    >I guess you could say that he is to historical scholarship what Thomas Kincade is to art.

    THAT BAD?
     
  6. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,940
    Likes Received:
    296
    Don't know anything about him.

    Couldn't care less.
     
  7. JohnDeereFan

    JohnDeereFan
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2009
    Messages:
    4,628
    Likes Received:
    11
    Not bad, necessarily, just a little cheesy and shallow.
     
  8. jaigner

    jaigner
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2009
    Messages:
    2,274
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wow, what helpful insight!

    Barton is more off-base than an Andy Pettitte pickoff victim. He should be completely disregarded.
     

Share This Page

Loading...