Do Righter Cynthia McClaskey Attacks Bible and Baptists

Discussion in 'General Baptist Discussions' started by DrJamesAch, Jul 25, 2013.

  1. DrJamesAch

    DrJamesAch
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,427
    Likes Received:
    0
    Do Righter Cynthia McLaskey Hebrew Blundering of Genesis 25:21

    [Promoting other websites? If there is a discussion for HERE, please start it. If you want free advertising for a KJVonly site, have the honesty to pay for it]
     
    #1 DrJamesAch, Jul 25, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 26, 2013
  2. Gregory Perry Sr.

    Gregory Perry Sr.
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    Messages:
    1,993
    Likes Received:
    0
    more info please

    Doc...I can't say as I've ever heard of this woman....care to elaborate on her "transgressions" in a bit more detail? And do I detect by the red text that Dr. Bob just publically rebuked you for something? By the way...I like your website (but that is a seperate issue). I also appreciate your "balancing" presence here. It is always good to have someone who is more knowledgeable and articulate than oneself around. I appreciate you even if others don't. It is always interesting to observe how some otherwise gracious people may respond to a bold presentation of the truth.

    Now...as I said...tell us about Cynthia McLaskey and her issues.

    Bro.Greg:saint:
     
  3. DrJamesAch

    DrJamesAch
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,427
    Likes Received:
    0
    It was not an advertisement for my website, it was simply a link to an article that I just happened to write, and me siting it is no different than anyone else site other websites in support of their arguments, and quoting numerous copyrighted material without permission from the authors which is not covered under Fair Usage. Is this a for-profit website? Or is it a 501(c)(3) religious corporation/church because I don't see the display for it?

    The article was more about a critic against Baptists who vilifies ALL Baptists whether they are KJV or not.

    And I did not know that I had to pay to link to my site because I do not sell anything on my website, nor do I advertise on my site (links are my site are simply favorite websites, those linked on the site are not paying me to advertise).
    So that is a pretty low-blow to accuse me of being dishonest when I don't see anything on your website, nor did you link anything to a specific forum policy that prohibits it. Just because I disagree with Calvinism does not give you the right to accuse me of being dishonest. You are basically accusing me of a crime which is a serious defamation of character. I understand that you don't like my opinions about Calvinism and the KJV, that's your prerogative, but when you start attacking my character as if I purposely attempted to defraud your website financially merely because you dislike my views is crossing the line.
     
  4. DrJamesAch

    DrJamesAch
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,427
    Likes Received:
    0
    Also curious if you advised Rick Norris (Logos) about the same "advertising rules" that you just said to me:

    "My new 100 page booklet entitled KJV-only Myths About Archaic Words is now available at www.lulu.com It is a greatly expanded and revised edition of a chapter on archaic words in my book The Unbound Scriptures. That section on archiac words was less than 20 pages. This booklet provides evidence that answers several inaccurate KJV-only claims about archaic words. This new booklet includes over 30 pages of examples where the KJV updated, revised, or made simpler renderings in the 1568 Bishops' Bible of which it was a revision. It also includes an example list of words found in one or more of the pre-1611 English Bibles that were not used in the KJV." http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?t=58932&highlight=unbound+scriptures

    Just a little bit sick of the double standards on here.
     
  5. Gregory Perry Sr.

    Gregory Perry Sr.
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    Messages:
    1,993
    Likes Received:
    0
    sssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss......BOOOOOOOOOM! Ouch...that's gonna leave a mark!:tonofbricks:

    Bro.Greg:saint:
     
  6. DrJamesAch

    DrJamesAch
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,427
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm just getting started. Wait till you see my next article!! Will be up by the end of morning (daylight for you)
     
  7. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    17,134
    Likes Received:
    52

    Maybe its because he uses sound logic and real facts?
     
  8. Don

    Don
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    Messages:
    10,550
    Likes Received:
    213
    I believe the BB rules don't allow for exceptions. If we allow one person to post links and advertise, then we must allow all, regardless of whether we like what they've written.
     
  9. Mexdeaf

    Mexdeaf
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2005
    Messages:
    7,051
    Likes Received:
    0
    The "Dr." had to do some digging to find a four-year-old post to whine about.

    The "Dr." should grow up.

    Some of us are sick of the "Dr." and his whining and wish he would just go away.

    The "Ignore" feature works great except when people quote him. :)
     
    #9 Mexdeaf, Jul 27, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 27, 2013
  10. Rippon

    Rippon
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    17,410
    Likes Received:
    328
    You have major discernment issues GPS.

    Like I said,you have major discernment issues. "A bold presentation of the truth" is far from the truth.
     
  11. DrJamesAch

    DrJamesAch
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,427
    Likes Received:
    0
    Excellent point!
    [snipped another attempt to divert from the "point" of the thread into a Calvinism debate. Tiresome and juvenile.]
     
    #11 DrJamesAch, Jul 27, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 27, 2013
  12. DrJamesAch

    DrJamesAch
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,427
    Likes Received:
    0
    You made that clear about me from day one before I even posted anything about Calvinism because I offended your dear antifundamentalist friend Jeri Massi, who thinks that all Baptists are perverts and child molesters. You defended an astrology worshiping Buddhist lover and then shut your mouth when I busted you out for lying about not knowing who she was.
     
  13. Rippon

    Rippon
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    17,410
    Likes Received:
    328
    You obviously don't know about DHK and Skan,among others when it comes to soteriology.

    There is certainly an anti-KJVO element here.

    All too true.

    How sneaky! Shh...don't tell anyoone else!

    And you are the master decoder,huh?


    And the inversion of Calvinism is correct?! You hold the keys to TRUTH in your little hands?

    If you are so all-fired-up about it --then start your own forum.
     
  14. Mexdeaf

    Mexdeaf
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2005
    Messages:
    7,051
    Likes Received:
    0
    A simple reading of this link will show who the "liar" is-

    http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?t=86108&page=2
     
  15. Gregory Perry Sr.

    Gregory Perry Sr.
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    Messages:
    1,993
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yawnnnnn!

    That is a matter of your VERY subjective personal opinion. While I know your buddy Rippon accuses me of having "discernment issues" (frankly, I am not too concerned with what he thinks) I believe that Doc's logic is sound and God-honoring and that his facts are solid and verifiable from what I can see. That is MY opinion. I believe it to be objective...but I know you will think it otherwise. Oh well. Thankfully...it is not my job to MAKE anybody think or believe anything. It is my "job" to honor my God and be as true as possible to His Word.


    Bro.Greg:saint:
     
  16. DrJamesAch

    DrJamesAch
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,427
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes! Good place to start, in particular post #14 where I respond to you denying knowing who I was talking about, then tried to clean it up after I busted you out. But, not only were you dishonest, but your attitude shows how you and others have been toward me from the very first posts that I posted, and then have the NERVE to act like I have been the aggressor.
     
  17. DHK

    DHK
    Expand Collapse
    <b>Moderator</b>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2000
    Messages:
    37,982
    Likes Received:
    134
    I am not a Calvinist.
    But I can speak to some of your complaints.
    The discussion of a Confession or Creed whether Calvinist or not, is not about Calvinism. It is about Confessions. If a poster takes that thread off the topic of confessions and turns it into Calvinistic doctrine, then he is in the wrong for derailing the thread.

    What if the thread was about the Catholic Catechism? Would it be about the "Catechism" or the discussion of Calvinism? Or even the discussion of "Purgatory"? One cannot derail the thread by taking the discussion away from the topic of "Catechism, Creed, Confession, etc." and start railing on any specific doctrine. They are in the wrong. Stick to the topic at hand. Make sure your posts are directed to the OP.

    If a thread is closed it is often because the poster's have gotten out of control. Read the rules. Post in grace, respectively, taking into consideration others. Love your neighbor as yourself.
    This may be a debate forum, but it is not necessary to be an embarrassment to all the world that is reading it. I or any other moderator shouldn't have to come here and edit half the posts, or do which is much easier--just close the thread. That is the primary reason threads get closed--not because they are Calvinistic or non-Calvinistic, but because the language being used is over the top, disrespectful, antagonistic, offensive, insulting, etc. It need not to be that way.
    Post in grace. If the rules are not clear then please read them again.
     
  18. Mexdeaf

    Mexdeaf
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2005
    Messages:
    7,051
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ach,

    Stop whining. That and twisting the words of others is not becoming of someone who has a "doctorate", who has supposedly memorized the entire New Testament, and to top it off, is a missionary in Israel.
     
  19. North Carolina Tentmaker

    North Carolina Tentmaker
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2003
    Messages:
    2,355
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don’t suppose there is much hope of turning this conversation back to Cynthia McClaskey and her attack on not just Baptists, but all Christians.



    I have to admit I read that description and thought, “Here is another feminist attacking Christianity and God’s word.”

    But then I went to her website and read her blog, especially her article, “Red Flags We Ignored.”

    It sounds like she was a member in a church similar to some of the IFB churches that have scared my own past. This woman deserves to be listened to.
     
  20. North Carolina Tentmaker

    North Carolina Tentmaker
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2003
    Messages:
    2,355
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wow, the more I read the more I like this woman.

    I found the article I think we were supposed to link to at the start of this thread.


    Cynthia then goes on to say:
    And then she goes on to show how scripturaly this is not true, and she is right.

    I have to say I agree with her. Men and women are equal before the lord and both of their prayers are heard. The idea of Isaac and Rebecca praying together, across from one another in the same room is a much more powerful and I beleive accurate image.
     

Share This Page

Loading...