1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Do we have to worship on Saturday not Sunday?

Discussion in 'Other Christian Denominations' started by xdisciplex, Sep 23, 2006.

  1. Gerhard Ebersoehn

    Gerhard Ebersoehn Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    9,025
    Likes Received:
    8
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    May I address your 'test' question.
    The Apostles were not lead by the Holy Spirit to command the Gentile Church to keep the Sabbath because they all, already kept it holy "in all the Congregations everywhere every Sabbath Day" unto the Lord Jesus -- of which simple fact the very Scripture of Acts 15 witnesses.

    (In any case, it is not the work of the Spirit to command what God has commanded already; least to command against what God has commanded already -- seeing the Word of God is forever more.)

    Then no one in his right senses will command the Gentile Church to keep the Sabbath because it has got the Lord of the Sabbath Day for reason to keep it; and besides have His resurrection from the dead its very basis and essense and historical precedent.
     
  2. TC

    TC Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 7, 2003
    Messages:
    2,244
    Likes Received:
    10
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Hi,
    Thanks for replying. Acts 15:21 (NIV) says that Moses had been preached in every city and read in the synagogues every Sabbath. It does not say that every Gentile congregation kept the Sabbath as commanded in Judaism. The argument was that some had gone out to the Gentile Churches and told the Gentiles that they had to become circumcised according to the custom taught by Moses before they could be saved. Peter responds by asking how they could put a burden on the Gentiles that neither we or our forefathers could bear. That burden that they could not keep was the keeping of the law and Peter made it clear that the Gentile believers were saved by grace just as the Jewish believers were.
     
  3. rstrats

    rstrats Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2002
    Messages:
    580
    Likes Received:
    2
    Faith:
    Baptist
    BobRyan,

    re: "The Sabbath commandment contains unique language that IS repeated in the NT. It is the ONE we find in Heb 4 ‘THERE REMAINS therefore a SABBATH REST for the people of God’".

    The "Lamsa Translation From the Aramaic of the Peshitta" is even more emphatic: "It is therefore the duty of the people of God to keep the sabbath."
     
  4. DHK

    DHK <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2000
    Messages:
    37,982
    Likes Received:
    137
    Bob you are simply playing a game of semantics. Moody didn't believe in keeping the Sabbath any more than any other believer of his age. Even back just 25-30 years ago many believers considered Sunday to be the Sabbath. Here is an article for you to chew on:
    It appears quite obvious that the author of this article used "Sunday" the first day of the week, and "the Sabbath" interchangeably, as did Moody, and most believers before that time. They beleived that when they were dedicating Sunday as a day holy unto the Lord as a day of worship and rest, that they were keeping the Sabbath as this article points out.
    DHK
     
  5. Gerhard Ebersoehn

    Gerhard Ebersoehn Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    9,025
    Likes Received:
    8
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    "... That burden that they could not keep was the keeping of the law ..."

    "The apostles and elders came together for to consider this matter ..." The REAL 'matter' of the council is given by Peter: "(God) put no difference between us and them, purifying their hearts BY FAITH ... through the GRACE of our Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved .... even as they (who received the Holy Spirirt 'even as us'). THEN, all the multitude kept silence." The issue was settled; the issue was: Righteousness by faith, or, righteousness by works?

    Sure, Peter literally meant that it was NOT "needful to circumcise them (or) to keep the law of Moses --- which in context just as surely, implies sacrifices etc. It never meant any of the moral principles of the Law OF GOD. But even though the Law any Christian was supposed still to have obeyed was God's Covenant Word of Ten Commandments, the 'matter' as far as the council was concerned, was not the duty of it, but the merit of it. No one could be saved by obeying the Great Law; it had been an impossible burden and always would be. Even less could the sacrifices amend for one's transgression of the Great Law. At the Jerusalem Council this was the real 'matter' 'considered. One "NEEDS" nothing but the grace of our Lord jesus Christ in order to be saved, because one is saved by grace.

    Now THAT was the message that was sent out from this council to the whole Sabbath-keeping Church of Christ. No allusion exists to any Congregation that did not assemble on Sabbaths and that did not read this very Moses by which none has, and none ever will be saved.

    There is no excuse in Acts 15 for not obeyeing God's Law of the sabbath Day; find it out now, rather than too late; the day of judgement won't know of an excuse either.
     
  6. Gerhard Ebersoehn

    Gerhard Ebersoehn Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    9,025
    Likes Received:
    8
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    The axiomatic assumption of circumstance in Acts 15 is a Church that existed under 'Sabbath-rule'. And another axiomatice preclusion of event in Acts 15 is a Church of both gentile and Jewish stock, undivided. Not the faintest allusion to this Church's existence or government under "First Day-rule' comes through.
     
  7. Gerhard Ebersoehn

    Gerhard Ebersoehn Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    9,025
    Likes Received:
    8
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Correction: ...of both gentile and Jewish stock, undivided ... should be: ...of both gentile and Jewish stock, divided.
     
  8. Gerhard Ebersoehn

    Gerhard Ebersoehn Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    9,025
    Likes Received:
    8
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    GE: Yes, repetitions there are a-plenty in the New Testament of the Sabbath; one needs not search for it; it is there throughout. It is only the wilful who won't admit --- even as it is only the wilful who won't admit the BASIS and STRENGTH of this Sabbath Day as precisely in this reference of yours: "It is THEREFORE, the duty of the people of God to keep the sabbath." "Therefore" refers to "If Jesus had given them rest" and "FOR HE that is entered into His rest". Undeniably the whole 'matter' rests on Jesus' resurrection from the dead, and 'therefore' the Sabbath directly rests on Jesus' resurrection from the dead.
     
  9. Claudia_T

    Claudia_T New Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2004
    Messages:
    3,458
    Likes Received:
    0

    why do you link the word "rest" in there to the resurrection? it doesnt say that at all
     
  10. BobRyan

    BobRyan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    32,913
    Likes Received:
    71
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    In Acts 15 the "apostles were not lead" to instruct gentiles not to blaspheme the name of God, nor were they led to tell them to honor parents NOR where they lead to tell them to Love God with all of their heart" Deut 6:5 NOR where they lead to tell them in Acts 15 to "Love their neighbor as themselves" Lev 19:18. Instead they relied on the fact that the Gentiles were already GETTING the scriptures each Sabbath as we see in Acts 13 and Acts 17.

    So in Acts 15 they just focused on the point of the debate.

    In Christ,

    Bob
     
  11. BobRyan

    BobRyan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    32,913
    Likes Received:
    71
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Option A - Quote the text and show what IT says.

    Option B - "Make stuff up"

    GE likes option B.:type: :laugh:
     
  12. BobRyan

    BobRyan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    32,913
    Likes Received:
    71
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    So - "Fourth Commandment Good" or "Bad" in the case of D.L.Moody? Was he arguing IN FAVOR of the Sabbath commandment but AGAINST the Sabbath in your view?

    (BTW - my point is that he argues FOR the Sabbath Commandment in the very areas where many Sabbath-breaking Christians argue against it).



    Indeed - they believed that man was free to edit the Law of God and that the "resulting Law" was just as much the Law of God as if man had never edited it.

    I agree that this was their view - even though I am not one to Edit God's Word in that way. However I do admire their faithfulness to God in wanting to honor His Ten Commandments.




    What is interesting is that they oppose the Ten-commandments-denying doctrine popular among some Christians today.

    In Christ,

    Bob
     
    #172 BobRyan, Oct 23, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 23, 2006
  13. Brother Bob

    Brother Bob New Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    Messages:
    12,723
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, we meet on Sat and Sunday so I guess I got it covered.
     
  14. BobRyan

    BobRyan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    32,913
    Likes Received:
    71
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    I always did say that Brother Bob was one of the "Good guys":thumbsup: :saint:
     
  15. Gerhard Ebersoehn

    Gerhard Ebersoehn Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    9,025
    Likes Received:
    8
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Originally Posted by Gerhard Ebersoehn
    GE: Yes, repetitions there are a-plenty in the New Testament of the Sabbath; one needs not search for it; it is there throughout. It is only the wilful who won't admit --- even as it is only the wilful who won't admit the BASIS and STRENGTH of this Sabbath Day as precisely in this reference of yours: "It is THEREFORE, the duty of the people of God to keep the sabbath." "Therefore" refers to "If Jesus had given them rest" and "FOR HE that is entered into His rest". Undeniably the whole 'matter' rests on Jesus' resurrection from the dead, and 'therefore' the Sabbath directly rests on Jesus' resurrection from the dead.

    Claudia T:
    "Why do you link the word "rest" in there to the resurrection? it doesnt say that at all"

    GE:
    It doesn't? Then to what would you - contextually - ascribe the use of the word 'rest' 'in there'?
     
  16. Gerhard Ebersoehn

    Gerhard Ebersoehn Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    9,025
    Likes Received:
    8
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    The Letter to the Hebrew believers always refers to the resurrection of Christ with metaphor - only once - in the very last chapter - does it speak of Christ being "brought to life again". Must one deduce from the absence of direct mention, that the writer nowhere esle takes the resurrection as presuppositional factuality throughout?
     
  17. Gerhard Ebersoehn

    Gerhard Ebersoehn Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2004
    Messages:
    9,025
    Likes Received:
    8
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Brother Bob:
    "Do we have to worship on Saturday not Sunday? ... Well, we meet on Sat and Sunday so I guess I got it covered.

    "Whosoever wills ..." (he got underneath) ... as long as according to his own will.
     
Loading...