Dont All Modern versions use basically Same Hebrew texts?

Discussion in 'Bible Versions/Translations' started by JesusFan, May 27, 2011.

  1. JesusFan

    JesusFan
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    6,356
    Likes Received:
    0
    Know that for NT, use mainly either CT/MT


    Dont all use same hebrew text for OT though?
     
  2. Greektim

    Greektim
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member
    Supporter

    Joined:
    May 22, 2010
    Messages:
    3,143
    Likes Received:
    118
    What NT translations uses the MT?
     
  3. JesusFan

    JesusFan
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    6,356
    Likes Received:
    0
    Doesn't the NKJV use it, in comparison to the tr greek text?
     
  4. Deacon

    Deacon
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2002
    Messages:
    6,970
    Likes Received:
    128
    All of the commonly accepted English translations use the Masoretic Text (MT) as the basis for their translation.

    As generally noted in their preface most (including the KJV) occasionally depart from the Masoretic Text, using the Septuagint, Vulgate, Dead Sea Scrolls and other ancient sources to supplement portions that are otherwise unintelligible.

    Of course the Dead Sea Scrolls were not found until the 1950’s so were unavailable to the translators of the earlier versions

    Rob
     
  5. Deacon

    Deacon
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2002
    Messages:
    6,970
    Likes Received:
    128
    NOTE:
    The abbreviation "MT" takes different meanings when used in different contexts.

    When used in an OT [Old Testament] context it means “Masoretic Text”, named for a group of Hebrew scholars in the 7th century after Christ that went to great lengths to preserve that which they had been given.

    When used in a NT [New Testament] context it means “Majority Text”, a text developed by collecting all available manuscripts (from all ages) and using the variant that the majority testify to.

    Rob
     
    #5 Deacon, May 27, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: May 27, 2011
  6. Greektim

    Greektim
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member
    Supporter

    Joined:
    May 22, 2010
    Messages:
    3,143
    Likes Received:
    118
    No... the NKJV is a TR translation that departs from both the Byzantine & MT many MANY times.
     
  7. Deacon

    Deacon
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2002
    Messages:
    6,970
    Likes Received:
    128
    While the 1611 KJV merely departs from them occasionally.

    Rob
     
  8. Greektim

    Greektim
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member
    Supporter

    Joined:
    May 22, 2010
    Messages:
    3,143
    Likes Received:
    118
    Actually... no!!!!

    The KJV departs from the TR more than the NKJV. But as the NKJV & the TR... the KJV also departs from the Byzantine as well as the Majority Text many times.
     
  9. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    29,402
    Likes Received:
    12
    No one has a copy of the exact eclectic blend of Greek texts used in 1611. The NKJV group worked long and hard to try to immitate the exact same Greek text.

    As to the op, I would say all Old Testament English versions are translated from the Masoretic Text except Stern's "Complete Jewish Bible" which is a paraphrased OT from the Jews own English translation of the Tanakh or Hebrew Bible itself
     
  10. Phillip

    Phillip
    Expand Collapse
    <b>Moderator</b>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2001
    Messages:
    6,708
    Likes Received:
    0
    Isn't it true that there are more than one version of the TR depending on the date it was put together and which person or group placed it together? Wasn't one version of the TR written almost as a reverse engineered text to match the KJV early editions.

    I visit a KJVO church because my daughter attends and it is interesting that we were given copies as gifts due to the anniversary of the KJV1611. I noticed immediately that something was missing. The Apocrypha. Like I always said, you haven't got a true 1611 clone unless you have the Apocrypha which was included without comment to the credibility between the New and Old Testaments.
     

Share This Page

Loading...