ENPR: Hillary's Wins Raise Prospect of the Unthinkable -- A Contested Convention

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Revmitchell, Mar 5, 2008.

  1. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,357
    Likes Received:
    789
    A group of prominent Democrats was being formed secretly to go to Clinton to ask her to bow out for the sake of party solidarity. Now, neither candidate, counting their current super-delegates and potential unpledged delegates, can win a majority of delegates even after the Pennsylvania primary April 22. It is hard to imagine either bowing out. That raises the possibility of carnage in Denver with the super-delegates and the disputed Michigan and Florida delegations in play.
     
  2. StefanM

    StefanM
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    6,429
    Likes Received:
    72
    ...and the eventual victory of Sen. John McCain.
     
  3. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,357
    Likes Received:
    789
    If I remember correctly Ladyeagle said she voted for Hillary in the primary in her area. The news on the local radio reported a big number of republicans voting for Hillary in Ohio. It appears that the republican strategy to vote for Hillary may be having its effect.
     
  4. KenH

    KenH
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    32,485
    Likes Received:
    0
    I wouldn't bet on it if the economy is in the toilet this autumn, which I think it will be(unfortunately).
     
  5. JustChristian

    JustChristian
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2007
    Messages:
    3,833
    Likes Received:
    0
    After 8 years of GW Bush the country is going to elect another Republican? Hardly.
     
  6. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,357
    Likes Received:
    789
    McCain is a republican by name only.
     
  7. tinytim

    tinytim
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/tim2.jpg>

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2003
    Messages:
    11,250
    Likes Received:
    0
    I am afraid you are right...

    NO matter who wins now, we will have a democrat president this fall.

    Why should republicans even vote now...
    This is the first election I have ever thought of sitting out on.

    What's the point.... whoever wins, Christians lose.
     
  8. StefanM

    StefanM
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    6,429
    Likes Received:
    72
    McCain is conservative. He's not Ron Paul, but he's definitely not Hillary Clinton, either.

    Anyone who thinks that Obama or Clinton and McCain are essentially the same is living in a dream world.
     
  9. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    16,642
    Likes Received:
    158
    Most Republicians are Republican in name only these days. Traditionally Republicians are for fiscal restraint. The last 8 years have seen the largest spending spree in our history ... one that should make anyone who calls him/herself a Republician blush with shame. :tonofbricks:
     
  10. dragonfly

    dragonfly
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,594
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, that's one good thing!
     
  11. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,357
    Likes Received:
    789
    Most certainly. He should have never bought into all those entitlment programs. However a large protion of this spending was due to 911 and a necessary war in Iraq.
     
  12. KenH

    KenH
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    32,485
    Likes Received:
    0
    It is a significant portion, yes, but the other spending that President Bush and Republican Congress increased was even more.

    And, invading Iraq was a war of choice, not necessity, as Iraq had nothing to do with the attacks on these United States on 9/11/2001.
     
  13. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,357
    Likes Received:
    789

    Repeated breaking of the cease fire agreement, 12 years of snubbing their nose at Weapons inspectors, a history chemical weapons use, the slaughter of his own people are all valid reasons for going in.
     
  14. JamieinNH

    JamieinNH
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    2,277
    Likes Received:
    0
    Assuming this is enough of an agrument to go to war, why didn't they use those points when they were drumming up support for the war with Iraq. Why did they have to reply on a bunch of mistruths and lies instead?

    Jamie
     
  15. JamieinNH

    JamieinNH
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    2,277
    Likes Received:
    0
    You are right on both accounts Ken. This adminstration has overspent like a drunken salior and yet most Republicans give him a pass...

    As far as the war goes, it can also be argued that we wouldn't have to spend that much money if we had gone in, toppled Saddam(won the war) and then left.

    Then we could have used the money that we are spending on this war for border patrol. Schools, education, etc... Instead we waste over 1 million dollars per day on a war that can't be won any more than it has already.

    Jamie
     
  16. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,357
    Likes Received:
    789

    Maybe you should go back and check again. They most certainly did. And there were no mistruths and lies. Zero, zilch, nada.
     
  17. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,357
    Likes Received:
    789
    It is the schools that spend money like a drunken sailor. They don't need any more until they start actually educating our children and stop being socialist enforcers.
     
  18. saturneptune

    saturneptune
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    13,977
    Likes Received:
    0
    Those who sit in the comfort of their cushy office or home and advocate prolonged war without having ever served should be sent to the front lines without delay.

    These are the people that wave the flag, sing "God Bless America", run down the interstate with their flags flying. And why, because it is entertainment to them, and they do not have to make any sacrifice. They get a real rush watching it on their wide screen TVs. Their patriotism is hallow, and their commitment is shallow.
     
  19. JamieinNH

    JamieinNH
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    2,277
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree that there is some waste in schools, but I don't think we spend enough for teacher salaries, for kids education to make sure our kids are taught right.

    I have several teachers that as friends and their "allowance" for shopping for the year is so small that they pay for most of the things out of their pockets. Mind you, these are teachers that care about their students and are not just working there because it's a nice comfy job..

    As any system, there needs to be a shake up, get the people out that aren't in it for the kids.. Allow them to spend and intrigue(sp) the kids and help them want to learn.

    I stand by my statment, we need to spend more on schools.. Spend it correctly, but spend more.

    Jamie
     
  20. JamieinNH

    JamieinNH
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    2,277
    Likes Received:
    0
    Oh there were certainly mistruths or lies.. Here are a few:

    1. Uranium from Africa
    2. Iraq has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes and other equipment needed for gas centrifuges
    3. Solid reporting of senior-level contacts between Iraq and al-Qaeda going back a decade
    4. We've learned that Iraq has trained al-Qaeda members in bomb-making and poisons and deadly gases


    Here is another link: http://www.publicintegrity.org/WarCard/

    Now, I am not arguing that we shouldn't have gone in and gotten rid of Saddam, but it should have ended there.

    So, if you are correct in your list of reasons to go to war with Iraq, then I have to ask why all the lies, and yes there were lies. It can't be denied, although I am sure you will continue to try.

    Jamie
     

Share This Page

Loading...