Feds Force Bank to Remove Christmas Decorations

Discussion in 'News / Current Events' started by carpro, Dec 17, 2010.

  1. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,894
    Likes Received:
    294
    http://www.koco.com/r/26162860/detail.html

    Feds Force Okla. Bank To Remove Crosses, Bible Verse
    Federal Examiners Say Religious Decoration Inappropriate

    PERKINS, Okla. -- A small-town bank in Oklahoma said the Federal Reserve won’t let it keep religious signs and symbols on display.

    SNIP

    Specifically, the feds believed, the symbols violated the discouragement clause of Regulation B of the bank regulations. According to the clause, "...the use of words, symbols, models and other forms of communication ... express, imply or suggest a discriminatory preference or policy of exclusion."

    The feds interpret that to mean, for example, a Jew or Muslin or atheist may be offended and believe they may be discriminated against at this bank. It is an appearance of discrimination.

    But customers Eyewitness News 5 talked to said they aren’t buying it.
     
  2. SpiritualMadMan

    SpiritualMadMan
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2003
    Messages:
    2,734
    Likes Received:
    0
    Time to shut down and become a Members Only Credit Union!
     
  3. Aaron

    Aaron
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    15,646
    Likes Received:
    223
    "Thou shalt not steal." Bet they'd let THAT verse stay up.
     
  4. webdog

    webdog
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,691
    Likes Received:
    0
    I bet this bank will be closed on Christmas. Why doesn't the fed step in and make them be open?
     
  5. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,894
    Likes Received:
    294
    Because they'll be off for Christmas themselves. ;)
     
  6. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,894
    Likes Received:
    294
    The feds would never have taken this politically correct idiotic stand under any other president.

    I suspect he ordered them to be on the lookout for a test case..
     
  7. JohnDeereFan

    JohnDeereFan
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2009
    Messages:
    4,628
    Likes Received:
    11
    The title is a little misleading. You say that it was the "feds", which refers to the federal government, but then you say the Federal Reserve, which is a private bank.

    If it was the federal government, then the bank should sue the snot out of them. If it was the Federal Reserve, then this is one more reason why the Federal Reserve should be abolished.

    The Federal Reserve doesn't have the authority to demand that anybody do anything.
     
    #7 JohnDeereFan, Dec 18, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 18, 2010
  8. JohnDeereFan

    JohnDeereFan
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2009
    Messages:
    4,628
    Likes Received:
    11
    It's actually the Federal Reserve that's doing it.
     
  9. KenH

    KenH
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    32,485
    Likes Received:
    0
  10. Salty

    Salty
    Expand Collapse
    20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,065
    Likes Received:
    214
    I would like to know the name of the individual who signed the initial order, and the individual who rescinded it!!!
     
  11. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,894
    Likes Received:
    294
    Uh huh.

    So what right do they have to tell any bank what Christmas decorations they can hang?

    We all know the federal Reserve is a defacto government agency.
     

Share This Page

Loading...