Following the moderators rules?

Discussion in '2004 Archive' started by av1611jim, Nov 5, 2004.

  1. av1611jim

    av1611jim
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2002
    Messages:
    3,511
    Likes Received:
    0
    I noticed that in the ten most recent threads as of 11:28 p.m. MST that there seems to be a deviation from the rules of this forum. This deviation is primarily the fault of they who oppose "KJV-onlyism".
    While this is not intended as a flame; I do have a simple question.
    Dr.Bob in his KJVO definitions post states that folks should refer to the KJVO and #1-5 when refuting or discussing the doctrine.
    I see this is not being done.
    Can anybody remind me why this is not happening?
    Just a curious ol' boy from the mountains.

    In His service;
    Jim
     
  2. Pastor_Bob

    Pastor_Bob
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2002
    Messages:
    3,461
    Likes Received:
    45
    To categorize the KJVO is not a posting rule in this forum. It is a helpful addition when describing a KJVO philosophy that you are trying to debate. If you'll notice, the thread entitled, Eleven Simple Rules for Posting, says nothing about ascribing a number to the KJVO belief you are confronting. That idea is presented in the thread entitled, Definitions of KJV Only.
     
  3. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    29,402
    Likes Received:
    12
    Most make a simpler distinction between
    KJV is preferred
    KJV is best
    KJV is only
    and it is evident in the post.

    I only pick up stones when folks cross 4 to 5 . . [​IMG] [​IMG]
     

Share This Page

Loading...