Fox news says refugee crisis is “putin’s scheme”

Discussion in 'Politics' started by poncho, Sep 11, 2015.

  1. poncho

    poncho
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Putin instead of Obama caused those millions of refugees pouring into Europe

    The show aired on September 5th, and interviewed their contracted expert:

    TRANSCRIPT, starting at 4:45pm:

    4:45, Interviewer: The other place that nobody seems to want to go these days is Russia and China, and Russia and China are both the two countries that have really gotten behind Assad, and certainly try to prop him up and those kinds of things; and as we look at pictures from China’s military day parade [posted onscreen], how much of this is Russia and China trying to slough off these refugees on Europe and everybody else … to try to gain political and global capital?

    McFARLAND: Well, in China I think less so, but Russia, certainly, because we’ve seen even in the last week that Russia has increased its military presence in Syria. Russia is trying to prop up the Assad government, like the Iranians are; and so Russia is sending military equipment; it’s sending it by sea, it’s sending it overland, it’s sending it by air, to try to prop up the Assad government to continue the fighting.

    Q: To continue the refugee crisis?

    MCFARLAND: Oh, sure, exactly.

    THE BACKSTORY:

    Whereas back in 2002 and 2003, the U.S. aristocracy’s biggest push for “regime change” was to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq; and whereas in 2011 the biggest push for “regime change” was to remove Muammar Gaddaffi from power in Libya; and whereas next in 2011 the biggest push for “regime change” became to remove Bashar al-Assad from power in Syria; and whereas in 2013 the biggest push for “regime change” became to remove Viktor Yanukovych from power in Ukraine; the biggest push for “regime change” now is to remove Vladimir Putin from power in Russia.

    Media-lies have been crucial to them all.

    Continue . . . http://www.infowars.com/fox-news-says-refugee-crisis-is-putins-scheme/


    US Seeks Occupation as US Fighters Flood Syria

    US policy paper called for the occupation of northern Syria with special operations forces. Now Foreign Policy reports northern Syria is being flooded by "volunteers" from America.

    September 8, 2015 (Tony Cartalucci - NEO) - US corporate-funded policy think-tank, the Brookings Institution, published a June 2015 paper titled, "Deconstructing Syria: Towards a regionalized strategy for a confederal country." The signed and dated open-conspiracy to divide, destroy, invade, then incrementally occupy Syria using no-fly-zones and both US and British special forces is now demonstrably underway.

    The paper would lay out in no uncertain terms that (emphasis added):

    The idea would be to help moderate elements establish reliable safe zones within Syria once they were able. American, as well as Saudi and Turkish and British and Jordanian and other Arab forces would act in support, not only from the air but eventually on the ground via the presence of special forces as well. The approach would benefit from Syria’s open desert terrain which could allow creation of buffer zones that could be monitored for possible signs of enemy attack through a combination of technologies, patrols, and other methods that outside special forces could help Syrian local fighters set up.

    Were Assad foolish enough to challenge these zones, even if he somehow forced the withdrawal of the outside special forces, he would be likely to lose his air power in ensuing retaliatory strikes by outside forces, depriving his military of one of its few advantages over ISIL. Thus, he would be unlikely to do this.

    Not only does Brookings lay out an open conspiracy to invade and occupy Syria, it does so with the open admission that the goal is not to degrade the fighting capacity of the so-called "Islamic State" (ISIS or ISIL), but rather to undermine and eventually overthrow the Syrian government. In fact, Brookings makes a point of stating that the goal would be to seize and hold Syrian territory to further advance American ambitions toward regime change, and would move quickly to degrade the Syrian government's ability to resist ISIS if any attempts were made by Damascus to stop the US invasion.

    Continue . . . http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2015/09/us-seeks-occupation-as-us-fighters.html#more
     
    #1 poncho, Sep 11, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 11, 2015
  2. righteousdude2

    righteousdude2
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2007
    Messages:
    10,466
    Likes Received:
    138
    Got to admit. Russia, China and India are not taking in any refugees! But then again, neither are those Arab states, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, etc. Maybe it is a hidden agenda. BUT, I prefer to think these nations and their leaders are not being lead by "bleeding heart liberals." Wish we had more of these kind of leaders and less of the ones giving our country away to every bleeding heart story the media pushes!

    We have our own people with needs. We have babies dying in the streets, Ghettos, Barrios, etc., and until we can clean up our own backyard, we need not be bringing in more mouths that will need feeding! IMHO! :flower:
     
  3. rsr

    rsr
    Expand Collapse
    <b> 7,000 posts club</b>
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Messages:
    10,074
    Likes Received:
    102
    It's a lot easier to get to Europe from Syria or Lebanon than to get to any of those places. They are far away and you'd have to go through Irag, Iran or Afghanistan. Besides, who wants to emigrate to Russia?

    The Gulf states are already overrun with foreign workers. Again, it's kind of hard to get to Australia, New Zealand or Japan from Syria. Besides, Australia has offered to take 12,000 refuges, which is more than the Obama has suggested. Japan has always frowned upon immigration, even though its population is declining even as its population continues to age, which is going to create a huge problem.

    You betcha. We need more leaders like Russia and China and Saudi Arabia have.
     
  4. poncho

    poncho
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Then WE shouldn't be creating the conditions that make people want to flee their countries and WE shouldn't be blaming it all on others.

    What would you have these people do? Stay home and wait for American, European, Saudi, Turkish and Qatari bombs to drop on them and American, European, Saudi, Turkish and Qatari supported Jihadis to remove their heads?

    Is that your strategy for ending this mass migration? Have them stay put and die so WE don't have to be bothered with them?

    I'd like to hear how asking people to commit suicide rather than admit OUR part in THEIR misery and misfortune can be considered "conservative".
     
    #4 poncho, Sep 11, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 12, 2015

Share This Page

Loading...