Globalist want Region 1 by 2010

Discussion in 'Politics' started by prophecynut, Jul 13, 2005.

  1. prophecynut

    prophecynut
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,263
    Likes Received:
    0
    July 13, 2005

    by Phyllis Schlafly


    The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) has just let the cat out of the bag about what's really behind our trade agreements and security partnerships with the other North American countries. A 59-page CFR document spells out a five-year plan for the "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community" with a common "outer security perimeter."

    "Community" means integrating the United States with the corruption, socialism, poverty and population of Mexico and Canada. "Common perimeter" means wide-open U.S. borders between the U.S., Mexico and Canada.

    "Community" is sometimes called "space" but the CFR goal is clear: "a common economic space ... for all people in the region, a space in which trade, capital, and people flow freely." The CFR's "integrated" strategy calls for "a more open border for the movement of goods and people."

    The CFR document lays "the groundwork for the freer flow of people within North America." The "common security perimeter" will require us to "harmonize visa and asylum regulations" with Mexico and Canada, "harmonize entry screening," and "fully share data about the exit and entry of foreign nationals."

    This CFR document, called "Building a North American Community," asserts that George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin "committed their governments" to this goal when they met at Bush's ranch and at Waco, Texas on March 23, 2005. The three adopted the "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" and assigned "working groups" to fill in the details.

    It was at this same meeting, grandly called the North American summit, that President Bush pinned the epithet "vigilantes" on the volunteers guarding our border in Arizona.

    A follow-up meeting was held in Ottawa on June 27, where the U.S. representative, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, told a news conference that "we want to facilitate the flow of traffic across our borders." The White House issued a statement that the Ottawa report "represents an important first step in achieving the goals of the Security and Prosperity Partnership."

    The CFR document calls for creating a "North American preference" so that employers can recruit low-paid workers from anywhere in North America. No longer will illegal aliens have to be smuggled across the border; employers can openly recruit foreigners willing to work for a fraction of U.S. wages.

    Just to make sure that bringing cheap labor from Mexico is an essential part of the plan, the CFR document calls for "a seamless North American market" and for "the extension of full labor mobility to Mexico."

    The document's frequent references to "security" are just a cover for the real objectives. The document's "security cooperation" includes the registration of ballistics and explosives, while Canada specifically refused to cooperate with our Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI).

    To no one's surprise, the CFR plan calls for massive U.S. foreign aid to the other countries. The burden on the U.S. taxpayers will include so-called "multilateral development" from the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank, "long-term loans in pesos," and a North American Investment Fund to send U.S. private capital to Mexico.

    The experience of the European Union and the World Trade Organization makes it clear that a common market requires a court system, so the CFR document calls for "a permanent tribunal for North American dispute resolution." Get ready for decisions from non-American judges who make up their rules ad hoc and probably hate the United States anyway.

    The CFR document calls for allowing Mexican trucks "unlimited access" to the United States, including the hauling of local loads between U.S. cities. The CFR document calls for adopting a "tested once" principle for pharmaceuticals, by which a product tested in Mexico will automatically be considered to have met U.S. standards.

    The CFR document demands that we implement "the Social Security Totalization Agreement negotiated between the United States and Mexico." That's code language for putting illegal aliens into the U.S. Social Security system, which is bound to bankrupt the system.

    Here's another handout included in the plan. U.S. taxpayers are supposed to create a major fund to finance 60,000 Mexican students to study in U.S. colleges.

    To ensure that the U.S. government carries out this plan so that it is "achievable" within five years, the CFR calls for supervision by a North American Advisory Council of "eminent persons from outside government . . . along the lines of the Bilderberg" conferences.

    The best known Americans who participated in the CFR Task Force that wrote this document are former Massachusetts Governor William Weld and Bill Clinton's immigration chief Doris Meissner. Another participant, American University Professor Robert Pastor, presented the CFR plan at a friendly hearing of Senator Richard Lugar's Foreign Relations Committee on June 9.

    Ask your Senators and Representatives which side they are on: the CFR's integrated North American Community or U.S. sovereignty guarded by our own borders.


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Phyllis Schlafly's new book The Supremacists: The Tyranny of Judges and How to Stop It is now available!
    Order online at 50% off retail price:
    http://www.eagleforum.org/
     
  2. LadyEagle

    LadyEagle
    Expand Collapse
    <b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    22,028
    Likes Received:
    1
    Thanks for posting this, prophecynut.

    May this put all the naysayers about the conspiracy theories regarding the CFR to rest. It's probably too much to hope for, though.

    Some conspiracy theories are true or are founded in a basis of truth. The designs of the CFR/Trilateral Commission are very true, as some of us have known for decades. Things are lining up for the One World Government as in Biblical prophecy.
     
  3. prophecynut

    prophecynut
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,263
    Likes Received:
    0
    Amen Sister, not too many pieces of the puzzle left to complete the picture. If their plan holds up, 2010 is very close to when the Antichrist begins to rule over the earth. :eek:
     
  4. KenH

    KenH
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    32,485
    Likes Received:
    0
    WE'RE #1! WE'RE #1! :D
     
  5. KenH

    KenH
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    32,485
    Likes Received:
    0
    You're dreamin', you're dreamin', you've got to be a dreamin'. [​IMG]
     
  6. Joseph_Botwinick

    Joseph_Botwinick
    Expand Collapse
    <img src=/532.jpg>Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2000
    Messages:
    17,527
    Likes Received:
    0
    Is that an end time pediction? Are you a date setter?

    Joseph Botwinick
     
  7. prophecynut

    prophecynut
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,263
    Likes Received:
    0
    Definitly not a prediction, based on solid OT Scriptural evidence.
     
  8. prophecynut

    prophecynut
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,263
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah, we are dreaming and Ken is hallucinating [​IMG]
     
  9. KenH

    KenH
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    32,485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hardly. :rolleyes:
     
  10. prophecynut

    prophecynut
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,263
    Likes Received:
    0
    Lady Eagle

    Previously in another thread I posted information on a proposal to establish 10 world regions, with the 7th region as Muslim or Arab. I believe the League of Arab Sates is the forerunner of the coming 11 horns or nations in Daniel. Present members of the Arab League are:


    Algeria---2
    Bahrain
    Comoros
    Djibouti
    Egypt---5
    Iraq---6
    Jordan
    Kuwait
    Lebanon
    Libya---4
    Mauritania
    Morocco---1
    Oman
    Palestine
    Qatar
    Saudi Arabia
    Somalia
    Sudan
    Syria ---11
    Tunisia---3
    United Arab Emirates
    Yemem

    Numbered are the first five nations from the western division of the old Roman Empire.

    Another 5 nations are needed from the eastern division of the old Roman Empire. Iraq, No. 6, definitely is one of the these 5 leaving 4 left to be determined.


    http://www.arabji.com/ArabGovt/ArabLeague.htm
     
  11. One View

    One View
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    139
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ok, you sparked my interest here. I checked out the CFR web site and the report in question. Never heard of any of these pinheads or could gather what influence they have, but it’s sure alarming to read what they propose.

    I’m not ready to shout from the roof tops, but I’ll sure keep an eye on this bunch.

    P.S. They seem a bit full of themselves.
     
  12. KenH

    KenH
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    32,485
    Likes Received:
    0
    The CFR is nothing to be concerned about. It's merely a think tank like the Cato Institute, the Heritage Foundation, the Brookings Institute, etc.

    I subscribe to the CFR's flagship publication, Foreign Affairs, and I thoroughly enjoy it and I'm a Christian.

    This hysteria that some conspiracy wackos constantly dream up is just that - wacko.
     
  13. JGrubbs

    JGrubbs
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2004
    Messages:
    4,761
    Likes Received:
    0
    To compare the CFR to the Cato Institute or the Heritage Foundation is laughable!!

    The founder of the CFR was a die-hard socialist, the CFR created the United Nations and supports the WTO, FTAA, CAFTA, NAFTA, CODEX, etc., all of which are dangerous for U.S. sovereignty!

    There is much to be concerned about with the CFR, even if their flagship publication denies it!

    To learn more about the CFR you can read Inside the United Nations by Steve Bonta and Freedom on the Altar by William Norman Grigg

    You join the "wackos" and speak out against much of what the CFR stands for and is pushing through Washington on one thread, and praise the CFR on another, you are hard to figure out. ;)
     
  14. KenH

    KenH
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    32,485
    Likes Received:
    0
    I can oppose liberalism/socialism, Jonathan, without joining up with conspiracy theorists. [​IMG]
     
  15. JGrubbs

    JGrubbs
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2004
    Messages:
    4,761
    Likes Received:
    0
    But the destruction of our borders, and expansion of global socialism is being pushed by the CFR, that is what they were founded for, that is why they created the UN, and are pushing the FTAA, NAFTA, CAFTA, CODEX, etc. I don't understand how you can support a group that was founded to create everything you say you are opposed to, and still say that they are nothing to be concerned about. Nothing in this post is from "conspiracy theorists", but based on facts from the CFR's history and current agenda.

    It's funny how people that choose to ignore facts about certain issues try to discount those facts by calling the messengers "conspiracy theorists".
     
  16. KenH

    KenH
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    32,485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Other than subscribing to Foreign Affairs I wouldn't exactly say I support the CFR. I just don't regard it as a huge bugbear like some people do.
     
  17. JGrubbs

    JGrubbs
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2004
    Messages:
    4,761
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, let me apologize for falsely accusing you of being a CFR supporter!!

    For the record, where do you stand on the UN, the FTAA, NAFTA, CAFTA, CODEX, etc., the reasons the CFR exists.
     
  18. JGrubbs

    JGrubbs
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2004
    Messages:
    4,761
    Likes Received:
    0
    From the OP:

    The CFR document lays "the groundwork for the freer flow of people within North America." The "common security perimeter" will require us to "harmonize visa and asylum regulations" with Mexico and Canada, "harmonize entry screening," and "fully share data about the exit and entry of foreign nationals."

    This CFR document, called "Building a North American Community [LINK]," asserts that George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin "committed their governments" to this goal when they met at Bush's ranch and at Waco, Texas on March 23, 2005. The three adopted the "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" and assigned "working groups" to fill in the details.

    It was at this same meeting, grandly called the North American summit, that President Bush pinned the epithet "vigilantes" on the volunteers guarding our border in Arizona.
     
  19. KenH

    KenH
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    32,485
    Likes Received:
    0
    The CFR exists to promote a discussion of foreign relations. No is going to agree with everything in Foreign Affairs(the authors of the various articles don't even agree) or in The National Interest or in the new publication The American Interest.

    I think there should be a place where the world's nations can meet and discuss major issues. I think the UN is much like our federal government; it reaches out further than it should.

    I support only trade agreements that provide for a level playing field between U.S. industries and foreign nation industries. For example, I don't like the way NAFTA has worked and without changes I am opposed to CAFTA. But I also don't want to return to the the Great Depression days of Smoot-Hawley.
     
  20. LadyEagle

    LadyEagle
    Expand Collapse
    <b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    22,028
    Likes Received:
    1
    Keep preachin' it, Brother Grubbs. I just know we've got to be distant cousins, LOL. [​IMG]

    prophecynut, you posted about Rev. 18 in one thread. I believe that is the UN, not USA. Thanks for the link, I'll check it out.
     

Share This Page

Loading...