Some argue that babies all go to heaven. This is not a point of contention for me. I lean that way myself. But some of these who argue that say that the reason why is because they are born without sin. They say that these babies suffer the effects of sin physically but not spiritually. They say that these humans are "not guilty". If they are not guilty of any sin then they do not need the blood of Christ to get into heaven. They have no sin for which needed atonement. Therefore, they get in without the cross altogether. This means this: Heaven is mostly populated by humans who got in without the blood of Christ. Most of Heaven's human citizens did not come by way of the cross. Most of Heaven's human citizens cannot praise the Lamb who died for them because he did NOT die for them- they got in because they are "not guilty". I base this "most" on a little research where I found that about 42 million babies are aborted worldwide each year and 8.03 million children die of starvation in the world every year and the natural death toll each year for ALL people including children is only, 54,750,000. So every year more children (or at least close to as many) die than adults and most adults are NOT going to heaven and ALL babies ARE going to heaven. So indeed, if babies are not guilty, then Heaven is by and LARGE populated without the cross of Christ. It is foreseeable that less than 10 percent of the human population of heaven gets there by the cross if babies are "not guilty"!!! Indeed when humans sing around the rainbow enshrouded, lightening lit throne of Christ, "Praise the Lamb who was slain for us!!", most of the human population will sit by in silence with the angels for that is a song that they cannot sing. Isn't that a HORRIBLE doctrine to you?