Featured Here Are The States Where Obamacare Subsidies Could Disappear

Yeah, my wife lost her insurance as well as my oldest... in your ear!

 

So should the SC vote by the rule of law, or should they vote for the ACA no matter what?

 

Sounds almost like taking hostages. Force people onto ACA plans after declaring their old plans unsatisfactory, and then bemoan the fact that people will be without insurance if the ACA is shut down.

 

Preacher, are you saying that Jesus and Paul did not teach the same things? Should I say that you are a higher critic?

 

The Democrats said that only states could have exchanges and then they said that the federal government is a state.

Then they say that the GOP had no right to ask the court if the word "state" meant "federal". Supposing that the SC rules that yes "state" always means "federal."

The Dems like to make fun of sick people--they are now telling them that they are going to die if they don't have insurance. That won't even happen in the Democrat stronghold of West Hollywood.

 

Crabby thanks for the map. I am so relieved that Kentucky is not affected.

 

Crabby:

Love to see what kind of spin THIS (CHRISTLIKE????) statement generates!!!

AFAIC, this one statement just begs for the originator to be put on "IGNORE".:sleep:

Makes most of his posts more understandable though with this theology!!!:sleeping_2:

 

You know exactly what is being asked; and your refusal to answer says you prefer to vote in favor of the ACA, even if such a vote technically violates the law.

 

You gotta remember C.T.Boy denies a lot of Paul's writing is scripture.

 

If you pick and choose Jesus' writings to fit your own wishes and ignore the teachings of Paul's, then yes they are different. If you balance Jesus with what Paul taught there is no conflict.

 

The central teaching of Christ is not how to treat each other, and it's not surrender to the state. It is "I am the way, NONE come to the father but by me", and, BTW, it is the ONLY message we are to preach to the world.

 

It's not a matter of whether I like it. If it currently violates legal principle, the SC should vote as such. If they vote simply because 8 million people will lose insurance coverage, then they haven't voted based on legal principle.

Yes, once they vote, it becomes law. The question is, will you be satisfied and supportive if they vote against the ACA?

 

How in the world is declaring that Jesus is the only way to Heaven a Liberal interpretation. That is just insane.