Hillary Ordered to give written testimony...under oath

Discussion in 'News / Current Events' started by carpro, Aug 19, 2016.

  1. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,897
    Likes Received:
    294
    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/20/us/politics/hillary-clinton-judge-emails.html?_r=0


    Judge Orders Written Testimony From Hillary Clinton on Emails


    A federal judge on Friday ordered Hillary Clinton to provide written testimony under oath about why she set up a private computer server to send and receive emails while secretary of state, ensuring that the issue will continue to dog her presidential campaign until the eve of the election.

    In a brief ruling issued on Friday afternoon, the judge, Emmet G. Sullivan of Federal District Court in Washington, approved a motion by the conservative advocacy organization Judicial Watch to pursue its vigorous campaign to expose Mrs. Clinton’s use of the private server. In addition to requiring her testimony in writing, the judge allowed the group to depose a senior State Department aide who had warned two subordinates not to question her email practices.
     
  2. InTheLight

    InTheLight
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2010
    Messages:
    16,213
    Likes Received:
    611
    It's a small victory, but a good one. The judge rejected a video testimony by Hillary, which would have been very damaging coming just before the election, and instead ordered a written response.

    Judicial Watch is an effective legal activist organization for conservatives.

    Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,897
    Likes Received:
    294
    The sad part is that the testimony is not due til after the election. Her legal team stalled the process just long enough.
     
  4. InTheLight

    InTheLight
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2010
    Messages:
    16,213
    Likes Received:
    611
    Yeah, I just read that she must respond to Judicial Watch within 30 days of an October 14th deadline, which means she could go past election day. Bummer.

    Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo
     
  5. Jkdbuck76

    Jkdbuck76
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2007
    Messages:
    2,263
    Likes Received:
    64
    Yes. We'll have to wait until AFTER the rigged election to see if she is in fact a crook, ya know cuz there's not enough evidence out there yet.

    Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk
     
  6. InTheLight

    InTheLight
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2010
    Messages:
    16,213
    Likes Received:
    611
    Oh my! The election is rigged. Well, I guess I won't vote then, since it's fixed.
     

Share This Page

Loading...