Holman Christian Standard Bible

Discussion in 'Bible Versions/Translations' started by FundamentalBaptist02, Sep 18, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. FundamentalBaptist02

    FundamentalBaptist02
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2006
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    0
    What do you all think about the Holman Christian Standard Bible?
     
  2. rbell

    rbell
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    11,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    a sound translation of the bible. not my absolute favorite, but a good one.
     
  3. El_Guero

    El_Guero
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    7,714
    Likes Received:
    0
    Some folks liked it in my thread asking about the ESV . . . whew! I don't have time to read all the versions to keep track . . .
     
  4. Rippon

    Rippon
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    17,403
    Likes Received:
    328
    The HCS Bible is wonderful -- #2 in my estimation . The planned revision of the ESV should take notes from the HCS .
     
  5. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards
    Expand Collapse
    <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    #5 Ed Edwards, Sep 18, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 18, 2006
  6. webdog

    webdog
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,691
    Likes Received:
    0
    I love it. You will notice it's the translation I quote from the most here on the BB (from e-sword).
     
  7. Askjo

    Askjo
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    3,736
    Likes Received:
    0
    The Holman Christian Standard Bible is based upon the corrupted Egyptian text according to David Cloud in his website. Sorry, I do not recommend it.
     
  8. Rippon

    Rippon
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    17,403
    Likes Received:
    328
    We'll be sure not to take your advice ASKJO . David Cloud is as reliable on the subject of Bible translations as he is on Calvinism .
     
    #8 Rippon, Sep 18, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 19, 2006
  9. gb93433

    gb93433
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    15,496
    Likes Received:
    6
    Is that the same text that Joseph claimed he had translated?
     
  10. Keith M

    Keith M
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    2,024
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ditto.

    I wouldn't lend too much credence to anything Cloud says. His "truth" is far from real truth.
     
  11. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards
    Expand Collapse
    <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    What is the meaning of 'based' in this context?

    In honesty, the translators of the HCSB used the so called
    "corrupted Egyptian text" (which is a lie) because
    it is available. In most cases the Majority Text reading is used.

    BTW, I'm still have righetous indignation against certain Bible Bashers
    who, if they can't tear down a Bible because it uses the
    Alexandrian Texts; then they will tear it down because it
    it footnotes the Alexandrian Texts.
    Said Bible Bashers cannot distinguish between those translations
    who use the Alexandrian Texts exclusively and those who
    only admit the Alexandrian Texts exist.

    The HCSB is a better translation for the 21st Century (2001-2100)
    better than the KJVs Translations.
     
  12. drfuss

    drfuss
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,692
    Likes Received:
    0
    I was told that the Holman Version was funded and developed for the SBC to avoid paying usage fees to other versions. Is this correct?
     
  13. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards
    Expand Collapse
    <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is probably correct. Lifeway (the sales point for the SBC) had the
    NIV and the KJV1769 verses parallel in the Sunday School Literature.
    They were paying through the nose for the NIV.
    The HCSB is cheaper for them to use.

    There is a difference, which i've noted up-topic (i.e. before in this topic).
    Consider the choice between the Alexandrian Texts readings
    and Majority Texts readings. The NIV usually went with the
    'best and oldest' Alexandrian reading footnoting the
    Majority Text; the HCSB usually goes with the Majority Texts
    and footnotes the Alexandrian texts reading.
     
    #13 Ed Edwards, Sep 19, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 19, 2006
  14. Keith M

    Keith M
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    2,024
    Likes Received:
    0
    So another of Cloud's "truths" is exposed as either lack of knowledge or else intentional deception.

    :tonofbricks: :laugh: :thumbs:
     
  15. Dave

    Dave
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2004
    Messages:
    275
    Likes Received:
    0
    From BibleGateway.com:
    Nestle-Aland is based on Alexandrian not Majority text, I believe. This is the basis for the new testament text in HCSB.
     
  16. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards
    Expand Collapse
    <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    From BibleGateway.com:
    //The textual base for the New Testament [NT] is the Nestle-Aland Novum Testamentum Graece, 27th edition, and the United Bible Societies' Greek New Testament, 4th corrected edition. The text for the Old Testament [OT] is the Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia, 5th edition.//

    That statement is also in my copy of the HCSB, in the Introduction.

    Dave: //Nestle-Aland is based on Alexandrian not Majority text,
    I believe. This is the basis for the new testament text in HCSB.//

    I don't believe you are correct.
    The examples i've checked (not all of them, of course)
    show that what I said is correct: //the HCSB usually goes
    with the Majority Texts
    and footnotes the Alexandrian texts reading.//

    I really don't have time to take up examples. I've got some
    grandchildren I'm supposed to raise ???
     
  17. EdSutton

    EdSutton
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    8,755
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not to mention, the SBC (which owns B&H through an entity) makes a couple of nickels every now and then when one sells,
    >
    >
    AND
    >
    >
    If it were to contain a little leaven, why worry? After all, leaven always does "raise the dough"! :laugh: :laugh:

    Now that I've gotten in my laugh, I personally like the HCSB better and better, each time I check it out. :thumbsup: It is far better than some other fairly modern versions, and it does seem that one can find a new one every few months or so. The last fact, I have no particular gripe with, FTR. Better 'too many'? versions than 'not enough'! versions, IMO.

    Ed
     
  18. EdSutton

    EdSutton
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    8,755
    Likes Received:
    0
    Aside form the last sentence in his post :confused:, what Ed Edwards says here seem to be basically correct. While the HCSB is suposedly 'based' on the N-A, practically this is hard to see, unless one is reading the brackets and footnotes, from what I've seen. The "proverbial straw" was the decision of the NIV owners to "update" into "gender-neutral" and what amounted to PC language. Thankfully, the SBC and BSSB?? said basically, "NO DEAL!", comissioned the late Dr. Arthur Farstad, the General Editor of the NKJV, as General Editor to do a New Version, and upon his death, chose Dr. Edwin Blum, to take his place.

    I do find it interesting that three relatively modern 'standard' versions have or have had Dallas Seminary types as the Editors:

    NIV - Dr. Kenneth L. Barker
    NKJV - the late Dr. Arthur L. Farstad
    HCSB- First Dr. Farstad, and then Dr. Edwin A. Blum.

    Ed
     
  19. Tony kelly

    Tony kelly
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2004
    Messages:
    75
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hcsb

    I read through the Bible in the HCSB last year really liked it .
     
  20. Phil310

    Phil310
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2003
    Messages:
    97
    Likes Received:
    0
    What do ya'll think of HCSB's translation of Proverbs 11:30..."violence takes lives." Instead of "...he who wins souls is wise."?

    Just curious what some of you language scholars could drum up to ease my conscience.

    By the way, I like the HCSB.

    :jesus:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Loading...