In my thread on the Festschrift for Dr. Maurice Robinson, Rippon insisted on using Wikipedia for a valid resource, and said, "JoJ, you really need to slow down and examine things before you speak off the cuff. Wikipedia needs to be used with discernment, but there is a lot of solid information there as well." Well, a friend of mine who is a professional in textual criticism pointed me to this link: http://evangelicaltextualcriticism.blogspot.com/search?q=wikipedia In any area of Bibliology (and most other areas), Wikipedia is so rife with errors that to cite from it is to open yourself to charges of ignorance and error! Would anyone like to share other mistakes in Bibliology on Wikipedia? There must be many more.