Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'General Baptist Discussions' started by Yeshua1, Oct 4, 2012.
Were there even such?
How about sharing your position on this first?
1.)"Pre-historic" is a fundamentally self-contradictory word to begin with, and second
2.)"Pre-historic" anthropological phenomena, are most likely examples of post-flood man having only the capacity to utilize those tools and materials immediately available to him post deluge until he was capable of re-mining and re-smelting those metals and materials that he was perfectly capable of knowing how to use pre-flood according to Genesis 4:
Gen 4:22 And Zillah, she also bare Tubalcain, an instructer of every artificer in brass and iron: and the sister of Tubalcain [was] Naamah.
God created first humans Adam and Eve, NO humans were on earth before that!
How Do you see "prehistoric man?" as per the Bible Record?
21 more posts to go to the big 4100!:tongue3:
I think the theory of evolution has given us a superior view of ourselves in thinking that "pre-historic man" was some kind of ape that grew smarter over time and developed into man. God created Adam and Eve and the historical account of their creation is in Genesis, so really, there is no such thing as "pre-historic" man.
Early man was just as intelligent as we are today, in fact, probably smarter.
True - No taxes, no pollution,no politicians and women did all the work
Ditto the question.
BTW, only 10 more to go.
that was true, just imagine if sayissaac Newton lived to be over 500 years old what he would have known!