IMB executive committee proposes revising Burleson action

Discussion in 'General Baptist Discussions' started by gb93433, Feb 15, 2006.

  1. gb93433

    gb93433
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    15,496
    Likes Received:
    6
    http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?ID=22660

    IMB executive committee proposes revising Burleson action
    By Tammi Reed Ledbetter, Southern Baptist Texan
    Feb 15, 2006

    GRAPEVINE, Texas (BP)--Trustees of the nine-member International Mission Board executive committee will recommend at the March 20-21 meeting in Tampa that trustees reverse a Jan. 11 motion asking the Southern Baptist Convention to remove Wade Burleson of Enid, Okla., as a trustee.

    IMB trustee chairman Thomas Hatley of Rogers, Ark., told the Southern Baptist TEXAN the committee determined that the matter of disciplining a trustee can be handled internally. Meeting Feb. 10 in Atlanta, the committee reviewed the Burleson matter and acted unilaterally to offer the new plan.

    The committee includes the chairman, first and second vice chairmen, recording secretary and chairmen of the board’s five primary standing committees.

    Hatley is informing trustees of the proposal through e-mail Feb. 15, with an official news release anticipated Feb. 16.

    “As a board, we continue to affirm our missionaries, our president and our staff, and we stand with them in leading Southern Baptists to reach the harvest fields of our world,” Hatley told the TEXAN, newsjournal of the Southern Baptists of Texas Convention.

    In several weeks, Hatley said he will release a comprehensive explanation of the board's earlier decision to assess missionary candidates regarding private prayer language and baptism, giving the historical and theological framework. Misinformation disseminated through informal weblogs caused confusion in the minds of some Southern Baptists, he said. He hopes a more detailed accounting of the timeline and rationale for those standards will help separate those issues from the matter of Burleson's personal conduct as a trustee and answer questions that have arisen.

    When the original action proposing Burleson’s removal was announced Jan. 11, Hatley said the board first explored other ways to handle the impasse with the Oklahoma pastor, who also is the immediate past president of the Baptist General Convention of Oklahoma.

    “The decision to seek removal was based on broken trust and resistance to accountability, not Burleson’s opposition to policies recently enacted by the board,” the official Jan. 11 statement read. At various intervals of the Jan. 9-11 meeting, Burleson posted updated reports on his weblog, or “blog,” of his interaction with trustees, refusing trustee requests to stop the practice out of concern that inaccurate and confidential information was being disseminated.

    Burleson said he used the weblog to express his concerns to a broader Baptist constituency, believing potential missionaries could be held back due to the new criteria and accusing certain trustees of “political power plays” and private caucuses.

    Since November, Burleson’s weblog and several others have maintained frequent discussion of the issues. Many of the weblogs include feedback from online readers rallying to the embattled trustee’s defense and calling for a large turnout at the annual meeting of the convention in Greensboro, N.C., June 13-14 to vote against his removal.

    Burleson, on his weblog Feb. 12, stated, “Trustee leadership has been very communicative with me these past three weeks, and I appreciate their hearts in dialogue. I have been asked to prayerfully consider shutting down this blog. Let me be clear. I have said, from the beginning, if I can be shown where my blog violates any policy or procedure of the IMB I will cease blogging immediately. In all fairness to my fellow trustees, blogging by a trustee is something new, and for everyone[’]s benefit I am considering possibly ending the blog until an official policy on blogging can be established in the [upcoming IMB trustee] meeting.”

    With the initial wave of e-mails and letters opposing the action against Burleson subsiding, Hatley told the TEXAN that he was beginning to receive many letters expressing appreciation for the stand taken by trustees.

    The policy on private prayer language regards the practice to be outside the norm of Southern Baptist doctrine and states that candidates holding to the conviction or practice eliminate themselves from consideration. The guideline related to baptism expects candidates to have been baptized in a church that practices believer’s baptism by immersion alone; does not view it as sacramental or regenerative; and embraces the doctrine of eternal security of the believer. Both the policy and the guideline feature an exception clause to allow for special situations to receive review.
     
  2. Grasshopper

    Grasshopper
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2002
    Messages:
    3,348
    Likes Received:
    14
    Seems now the "offical" statement will come out tommorrow. Seems what was written in the Texas article was not necessarily the views of the board. We shall see.


    http://kerussocharis.blogspot.com/
     
  3. gb93433

    gb93433
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    15,496
    Likes Received:
    6
    I suspect they want to keep their image up instead of getting into hot water.
     
  4. Jimmy C

    Jimmy C
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,250
    Likes Received:
    0
    Check out Burleson's site today - evidently Tammi Ledbetter (Baptist Press and the SB Texan)put words into The chairman of the IMB's mouth that he did not say to get the spin on the article that good old boy network wanted on his statement. Burleson called the chairman on it - specifically the fact that the IMB board would "discipline" Burleson behind closed doors, the chairman said that he did not intend that to mean that Burleson would be disciplined.

    This is another indication to me that the old guard has no idea how to operate in the age of the internet -blogs etc. In the old days, they did and would say anything they wanted in the BP and could not be challenged - at least on a broad scale. That day has passed, Tammi Ledbetter wrote at best a half truth, and gets challenged immediately. I wonder if Dr Burleson will see an apology or retraction/ clarification from BP or the SB Texan
     
  5. Jimmy C

    Jimmy C
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,250
    Likes Received:
    0
  6. Grasshopper

    Grasshopper
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2002
    Messages:
    3,348
    Likes Received:
    14
    They are in panic mode and doing the backstroke. No more "smoked filled room" decisions in the internet age. If they were going to try to remove Burleson they would have had to explain why, then Burleson would be free to reveal what he has seen and heard in his defense. They DO NOT want that. It is still not a settled issue:


    http://kerussocharis.blogspot.com/
     
  7. gb93433

    gb93433
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    15,496
    Likes Received:
    6
    Typical SBC politics. Isn't it amazing how much they pray first and contact the Holy Spirit later? :rolleyes:
     
  8. Jimmy C

    Jimmy C
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,250
    Likes Received:
    0
    Baptist Press is out with a new article - they wont totally admit that they misquoted Hatley to please the good old boy network - but they get as close to it as they can:

    "Burleson posted a blog Feb. 16 that expanded on his conversations with Hatley. The discussions were prompted in part by a statement in Baptist Press Feb. 15 that “the committee determined that the matter of disciplining a trustee can be handled internally.” Hatley confirmed the phraseology to Baptist Press but clarified that he was speaking about the proposed accountability guidelines.

    In his blog, Burleson wrote, “I discovered that Tom did not mean to imply that the Board would discipline me.... In no way was he referring to me specifically. I thanked Tom for this explanation, and I told him that people reading the article, including Baptist editors nationwide[,] were adding a subtitle that said, ‘Trustees to seek discipline internally’ and made it sound like the Board would seek discipline behind closed doors....”"

    The full article can be found here:

    http://www.sbcbaptistpress.org/bpnews.asp?ID=22668

    Dont look for any apology from Tammi Ledbetter - not her style
     
  9. PastorSBC1303

    PastorSBC1303
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2003
    Messages:
    15,125
    Likes Received:
    0
  10. cindig2

    cindig2
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2005
    Messages:
    70
    Likes Received:
    0
    So.....some Southern Baptist don't believe that gifts given by the Holy Spirit are for building up the body of believers.....it's now something private to build our own selves up? I think they need to get together and come to a conclusion what they believe the scriptures to say......not this is what I do, this is my conviction to have a private prayer language. Especially someone in such a position.
     

Share This Page

Loading...