1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Is God o.k with the term "King James"?

Discussion in '2005 Archive' started by Ben W, May 1, 2005.

  1. av1611jim

    av1611jim New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2002
    Messages:
    3,511
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gold!
    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]
    It is simply a curiosity issue really.
    We know originally the KJV was/is called the AV. So where, when, why did it begin being called KJV. That's all. Just curious. Don't have a cow man! ;) [​IMG]

    In HIS service;
    JIM
     
  2. Gold Dragon

    Gold Dragon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2005
    Messages:
    5,143
    Likes Received:
    149
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    [​IMG] Not having a cow. Just seeing if I can help you find what you are looking for which isn't all that clear from how you've stated it.

    It sounds like you are looking for option #3, the first reference of the translation as the KJV. I'll see what I can do.
     
  3. av1611jim

    av1611jim New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2002
    Messages:
    3,511
    Likes Received:
    0
    thanks buddy!

    In HIS service;
    Jim [​IMG]
     
  4. Ben W

    Ben W Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2002
    Messages:
    8,883
    Likes Received:
    6
    </font>[/QUOTE]I would have thought that the term "the Most High" would be one reserved for God?
     
  5. TexasSky

    TexasSky Guest

    The reason the King James bible is named so is because people were complaining about the Bishop's Bible and so King James asked that a translation be made which fit certain standards King James felt strongly about, such as accuracy and understandability. A committee was formed, and they actually used the Bishop's Bible, then compared it to Greek Manuscripts they had available. In 1611 they printed it, but James never actually authorized it. It became known as the Authorized Version even without his authorization. In 1769 Oxford Press re-did it, trying to correct errors in the 1611 version. This 1769 version is what those who use the King James Version use.

    The name indicates who took responsibility for the translation.
     
  6. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    80
    Slight correction

    Cambridge users have a 1762 edition

    Most American publishers use one of several American updates.
     
  7. av1611jim

    av1611jim New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2002
    Messages:
    3,511
    Likes Received:
    0
    </font>[/QUOTE]I would have thought that the term "the Most High" would be one reserved for God? </font>[/QUOTE]You would be correct if you are coming from the mindset of a 21st century man but if you were coming from the mindset of 17th century England "Most High and Mighty Prince James" is quite apporpriate. That is, since in Engalnd of that time he was the most high and mighty ruler of those people. :D

    In HIS service;
    Jim
     
  8. Logos1560

    Logos1560 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Messages:
    6,219
    Likes Received:
    406
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The KJV was not originally called the AV. The word "authorized" was not on the original title page of the 1611.

    David Daniell noted: "'The Authorised Version'
    was a title popularly given to it quite late in its history" (THE BIBLE IN ENGLISH: ITS HISTORY AND INFLUENCE, p. 428). Daniell pointed out that
    the OXFORD ENGLISH DICTIONARY gives "the first appearance of the phrase, 'What is called our authorized version,' as 1824" (p. 429).
     
  9. TexasSky

    TexasSky Guest

    Thank you C4 re the Cambridge copy.
     
Loading...