I found this on a debate site: Omnipotence: The ability to do anything. But we could not logically discuss a god who thwarted logic, so we must restrict ourselves to punk omnipotence rather than true omnipotence: An omnipotent god, then, can do anything except violate logic. No square circles; no married bachelorsSo, how would you answer him? Would you disagree with his statement, "we could not logically discuss a god who thwarted logic"? Would you disagree with parts of his premise? If there is even one thing that God cannot do then why do we claim that he is Omnipotent?