I will ask that others respect our wishes, and allow myself and mrs. wookie to have a one on one discussion. As long as it is just she and I, we will stay on topic, and I am excited to see what she has to say. PLEASE OPEN ANOTHER THREAD IF YOU WISH TO COMMENT ON OUR DISCUSSION. Now, to business. Mrs. Wookie, you believe that they KJV is perfect, and no other english translation is. I have a few questions as to how you came to that belief. 1. When you say perfect, do you mean that it is word for word exactly what God inspired Paul, Peter, John, Matthew etc to write in the original autographs? Word for word, letter for letter, "every jot and tittle", or merely perfect in doctrine? Be very specific. 2. What evidence is there that the KJV is a perfect reflection of what the biblical writers original wrote, since A) no 2 manuscripts agree 100%, B) Many readings from the KJV have almost zero greek support, and C) The KJV translators themselves made many statements indicating they did not believe that they had just created a perfect bible. 3. There are minor differences in the various KJVs out there today. The 1611 does not look anything like the KJV used today. The Oxford has a few word changes from the Cambridge. Which KJV (publisher and date) is the "perfect KJV" that you speak of? I have others, and I dont need anyone else to help me here, so dont post answers or other questions PLEASE. Allow Mrs. Wookie to answer, and allow me to respond directly to her. Thank you for your gracious agreement, Mrs. Wookie. I trust you believe my questions are sincere and designed to find the truth.