Or do christians which are against the NIV and prefer the KJV simply think that the KJV is better but still not inerrant? I mean what would happen if somebody decided to bring out a new bible which is based on the same manuscripts which the King James is based on? If he would also use the masoretic text and the textus receptus to make his own bible would it be as good as the King James if he's a good translator? His translation would not be exactly like the King James because it is very unlikely that 2 people translate a text using exactly the same words but it would still be based on the same manuscripts which the KJV is based on. Would it be acceptable for a KJV-fan to also read a different bible which is based on the same manuscripts or do KJV-fans despise everything which is not KJV?