"It's Twain, Jim, but not as we know it."

Discussion in 'News / Current Events' started by Matt Black, Jan 13, 2011.

  1. Matt Black

    Matt Black
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Messages:
    9,141
    Likes Received:
    0
    #1 Matt Black, Jan 13, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 13, 2011
  2. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K)
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    78
    This is extremely 1984esque. We can't hide the reality of history. Both stories tell the problems of racism. Neutering them dilutes that message.
     
  3. Matt Black

    Matt Black
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Messages:
    9,141
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree; it also misses the point that Twain, by the standards of his time, was anti-racist.
     
  4. SpiritualMadMan

    SpiritualMadMan
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2003
    Messages:
    2,734
    Likes Received:
    0
    It also misses the point that a White Person can be Niggardly.

    But, then context and intent means nothing to the PC Crowd!
     
  5. Matt Black

    Matt Black
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Messages:
    9,141
    Likes Received:
    0
    'Niggardly' has a different etymology.
     
  6. rbell

    rbell
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    11,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    Monumentally stupid idea. (the edited book, that is)
     
  7. Earth Wind and Fire

    Earth Wind and Fire
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    Messages:
    18,915
    Likes Received:
    94
    Like "Welshing" on a bet (Taffie) LOL
     
  8. Matt Black

    Matt Black
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Messages:
    9,141
    Likes Received:
    0
    That does have ethnic connotations in its etymology.

    Isn't this blatant Bowdlerisation?
     
  9. Earth Wind and Fire

    Earth Wind and Fire
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    Messages:
    18,915
    Likes Received:
    94
    Are you concerned that Americans may be corrupting their own cultural history, perhaps?
     
  10. Matt Black

    Matt Black
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Messages:
    9,141
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes, and also I don't believe in censorship or making something 'politically correct' retrospectively. For example, we had a children's author in this country called Enid Blyton, whose Noddy books contained various golliwog characters. Recent new TV and written versions of the Noddy franchise have seen 'Mr Golly' replaced by 'Mr Sparks' and the introduction of Dinah Doll as a token black character. Now, I have no objection to that as it is (a) no longer appropriate that we use that sort of language and (b) these are entirely brand new Noddy stories. What I do object to though is the airbrushing-out of the Gollies from the pre-existing stories actually penned by Blyton herself. The use of the term then was not generally abusive so it is inappropriate to remove it from books written then; it is considered racially abusive now and it is therefore appropriate to remove it from Noddy books written now.
     
  11. sag38

    sag38
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2008
    Messages:
    4,394
    Likes Received:
    1
    It's the same stupidity that lead to "Parent One" and "Parent Two" designations instead of "Father" and "Mother" on U.S. passports. After all we don't want to offend the child who has two dads or two mommies.
     
  12. sag38

    sag38
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2008
    Messages:
    4,394
    Likes Received:
    1
    Now in the very politically charged country of Canada the song "Money for Nothing" by Dire Straits has been banned because it uses the word "little fa**ot." The context doesn't matter. The isn't being derogatory to homosexuals. It's being derogatory to those who don't like them and call them fa**ots. It's the word that matters and so it has been banned. This kind of idiocy is soon to follow right here in the good ole USA. Thank you to everyone who votes for Democrats. You will be partly to blame and responsible when more and more terms, books, songs, plays, movies, etc., are banned or edited because someone is offended by a term. Such is the play ground of liberals.
     

Share This Page

Loading...